-->*OFFICIAL: MSI GT725 Owner's Lounge*<--

yup did all that and press beging bmark it will load the game and i have to play it other wise it will kepp falling in water dying and then again an agian

and if i stol the game it will give me this

9/02/2009 03:42:38 - Vista
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High

Beginning Run #2 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1600x1200, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

09/02/2009 03:42:38 - Vista

Run #1- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High
Run #2- DX10 1600x1200 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High

 

ahhh, I think I know what the problem is (and why I despise Vista). Try running the Crysis benchmark tool as an administrator (right click on the application and go to run as administrator), then try the benchmarking again.

 

when you installed it, did you say yes to everything. and if it asked to install dx9 did you click yes for that as well? (i forget if that is the game asking for that)
also turn off that windows user account control.

maybe why i never had a problem installing..i never have that on as well.

also try it with x-fire on and off. see if anything changes..

 

could you run Crysis on the MSI GT725 at these settings and tell me the average FPS you get?

 

guess you missed the part where he said he is having problems running it

 

man o man i did nt know some solution can be so simple

i tired runing crysis inbulit bmaerk as admin it says cmd cant be reconise as inter os external cmd. could be bz i instal the game only for this user.

but the tool i got when i ran that it work freaking hell it worked wooo hooo
finaly i got result lol thank ichme

john yes i did says yes to everything .

but never mind that i am gonna run some bunches now what would u guys like to see ?

 

cool!
make sure you set it up in game first as ichime suggested else you will get a false benchmark.

so first run is 1680x1050
everything set to "high"
don't get fancy just yet...lol
click apply at both sets of screens. one for res and one for the all high settings.
exit out of game.
then run the benchmarking tool and set it exactly how it's set in game.
and no you can't run two different test one right after the other. you will have to go back in game and change them again.

 

ok i went into game first setting res 1680x1050 apply
adv everything high apply
exit
run bmark tool everything high 1680x1050 loop 3 time 9 dx10 added being bamrk
its runing now finger cross

 

TA DA
09/02/2009 04:52:48 - Vista
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 80.29s, Average FPS: 24.91
Min FPS: 17.51 at frame 139, Max FPS: 31.18 at frame 999
Average Tri/Sec: -24274020, Tri/Frame: -974503
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.94
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 75.57s, Average FPS: 26.47
Min FPS: 17.51 at frame 139, Max FPS: 32.15 at frame 76
Average Tri/Sec: -25487474, Tri/Frame: -963061
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.95
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 75.13s, Average FPS: 26.62
Min FPS: 17.51 at frame 139, Max FPS: 32.47 at frame 67
Average Tri/Sec: -25615118, Tri/Frame: -962267
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.95
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

09/02/2009 04:52:48 - Vista

Run #1- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.545

 

well hell! aint that near better than 2 3870's????

thank you sir.

now could you please run that guy who asked about 5 times in this thread for a 1280x800
thanks.

lol

 

I was thinking the same thing but i read his post again and i cant find please anywhere lol

 

Originally Posted by terminus123 View Post
1280x800
DirectX10
Texture: High
Objects: High
Shadows: High
Physics: High
Shaders: Very High
Volumetric Effects: High
Game Effects: High
Post Processing: Very High
Particles: High
Water Quality: Very High
1280x800

46 pages and still no Crysis benchmarks? I'm astonished!

 

no option of 1280x800 in the game the only closest i can match is 1280x720

runing now.

i am runing these stock level and the one b4 aswell was they any good ?

edit:- forgot to mention i install the old version of ati driver today

 

Also give 1440x900 @ high a shot too, seems to be the sweet spot for a system like yours (i.e. Gateway fXs, Clevos with single 9800M GTs, GTXs, etc.)

 

here we go its not that i did nt want to do it but the bmark was nt working from 3 days

09/02/2009 05:12:43 - Vista
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1280x720, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Custom
Custom Quality Values:
VolumetricEffects=High
Texture=High
ObjectDetail=High
Sound=High
Shadows=High
Water=VeryHigh
Physics=High
Particles=High
Shading=VeryHigh
PostProcessing=VeryHigh
GameEffects=High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 78.92s, Average FPS: 25.34
Min FPS: 15.53 at frame 155, Max FPS: 31.49 at frame 876
Average Tri/Sec: -22956780, Tri/Frame: -905876
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.01
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 73.87s, Average FPS: 27.07
Min FPS: 15.53 at frame 155, Max FPS: 32.69 at frame 78
Average Tri/Sec: -24004270, Tri/Frame: -886591
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.03
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 73.38s, Average FPS: 27.25
Min FPS: 15.53 at frame 155, Max FPS: 32.69 at frame 78
Average Tri/Sec: -24160456, Tri/Frame: -886467
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.03
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

09/02/2009 05:12:43 - Vista

Run #1- DX10 1280x720 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Custom ~~ Overall Average FPS: 27.16

 

ichime your next lol

 

stock meaning 2.5g ghz right?

run them fully over clocked as well.

 

thanks soooo much!!!! hurrayyy!!! I'm probably going to get this laptop now.

 

yup 2.5

u mean run it with over clocked cpu/gpu

ichemi i can ran your in 1400x1050 sorry no 900 option

does it matter if i check full screen or not ? bz i m doing it in full screen

 

no prob

09/02/2009 05:23:19 - Vista
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1400x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 68.06s, Average FPS: 29.39
Min FPS: 13.79 at frame 149, Max FPS: 36.21 at frame 976
Average Tri/Sec: 30340962, Tri/Frame: 1032498
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 63.14s, Average FPS: 31.67
Min FPS: 13.79 at frame 149, Max FPS: 38.49 at frame 71
Average Tri/Sec: 33086514, Tri/Frame: 1044619
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.88
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 62.79s, Average FPS: 31.85
Min FPS: 13.79 at frame 149, Max FPS: 38.74 at frame 1004
Average Tri/Sec: 33298582, Tri/Frame: 1045372
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.88
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

09/02/2009 05:23:19 - Vista

Run #1- DX10 1400x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 31.76

 

1400x1050 is fine, nice scores. Very strong card!

 

I have a couple nub questions:
-what does the option "Vsync" technically do?
-upgrading to a Windows 64-bit, how much FPS boost would there be on Crysis (with 4GB ram)?

 

Vsync basically caps framerates (usually to 30fps), so the maximum FPS won't go over that value.

The performance difference between Windows 64-bit and 32 bit in Crysis is often negligible.

 

V-sync basicllay prevents the game from stuttering by locking it up @ certains fps to keep running smooth constantly.

15fps
20fps
30fps
45fps
60fps

for benchmarking this setting should be disabled.

you will see a performance increase. but the x64 versoin is not to stable. when i last used it.

 

ok to slow. i like your explaination better.

 

Very nice.

 

here oc 1680 x 1050

09/02/2009 05:40:30 - Vista
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 72.41s, Average FPS: 27.62
Min FPS: 16.93 at frame 145, Max FPS: 33.82 at frame 875
Average Tri/Sec: -26915898, Tri/Frame: -974474
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.94
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 68.65s, Average FPS: 29.13
Min FPS: 16.93 at frame 145, Max FPS: 35.42 at frame 85
Average Tri/Sec: -28028334, Tri/Frame: -962078
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.95
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 68.50s, Average FPS: 29.20
Min FPS: 16.93 at frame 145, Max FPS: 35.72 at frame 61
Average Tri/Sec: -28113044, Tri/Frame: -962840
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.95
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

09/02/2009 05:40:30 - Vista

Run #1- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 29.165

 

wow a lot better than the Gateway FX 7811:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=297984&page=6

hey faisal, for your bm06 10k+ benchmark, what settings did you OC for your video card and CPU?

 

So by the looks of it the hd4850 is at least on par with the 9800gtx as far gaming goes.

 

yes oc both

give me a few days and this rig will do a lot better. i am currently under traning by master YODA and Obi-Wan-kenobi

 

Can I just take a moment to say how spot on I was in my predictions of the 4850's Crysis performance?

http://forum.notebookreview.com/showpost.php?p=4319687&postcount=129

I was correct within 1 FPS of the card's actual performance, and this can attributed to faisal running in DX10 on Vista.

 

yup ur predictions was good

 

may I please ask how did you managed to over clock your GPU ???

tanks


A Falling Cat named Spangky

9 Lives Only ...

 

I'm currently laptopless after selling mine, so the benchmarks I did were with a downclocked HD 4850.

There are threads in the Gaming forum for how to overclock.

 

yes you may

via ati catalyst u can overlock ur gpu

 

sweet, ATI makes it easy, what MHZ do you recommend to OC to?

 

Use the Auto.

 

Well, according to what we've seen and been told, the max clocks are 550mhz core and 900mhz memory. Maybe using an external overclocking tool could help go past that value, but you'll have to test if it's stable first.

Yeah, it was pretty accurate, though it was DX9. I also ran and posted something similar but in Vista and DX10, and it was also within 1fps of what faisal posted.

Well, this is just one game, but seems that stock vs stock, the 4850 is stronger at those settings, though the GTX can make up for it with its higher OC ability for now.

 

Hey Faisalhero how much bloatware did MSI install on the 725?

 

can you use the vista key that came with the laptop to install 64 bit vista? and does the system report the full 4gigs in 32 bit vista?

 

But, Red_dragon I already tracked down that thread when the 4670/4850/4870 mobile radeons were announced and AMD demoed it on an ASUS W90 with crossfired 4870s, scoring c. 15k 3DMark06. The links are buried WAY back in this thread somewhere...

[EDIT]
@ichime
VSYNC, or the VERTICAL REFRESH RATE of your display, ~60Hz in the case of most LCDs, which means if VSYNC is enabled the game engine(or whatever) will try to limit(or match if below) 60FPS, which should be in this case.

75Hz -> 75FPS
85Hz -> 85FPS
etc.

VSYNC off, the engine/app/whatever will attempt to generate and render as many FPS as it possibly can, but may result in some visual artifacts, e.g. tearing
[/EDIT]

 

32 bit SP 1 will show it, but is still unable to utilize it. And yes, you can use it to install 64 bit. You just need to get an install disc from somewhere.

 

Hey guys,

I'm finally converting from desktop to notebook and am about to pull the trigger and buy a new laptop.

So far, the scores here are impressive...but I'm waiting to see what the NVIDIA guys are up to before I buy anything.

Regardless, those scores are tempting...What driver is MSI using for this?

Has anyone run more benchmarks?

 

NVidia won't have a response until late Q4 2009 or Q1 2010 with the GT200 series. Even then, we still haven't seen the HD 4870 in action yet.

 

can someone elaborate how noisy the fan is?

I mean can i enjoy hearing music or will it overtuned by the noisy fan?

thx for all the answers.

 

they did there fair bit when i got it i think about c drive was already somewhere 20 to 25 gig used

noise what nosie

i hope this helped

 

good one. waiting for a 15'' type ..if possible..lol

 

Cat 8.11 or something newer? Drivers are the only scary thing about these new ATI GPUs.

 

The only 15"er that'll (possibly) have this would be the m15x and M860TU (and others based on this chassis, since they both currently support the 9800M GT).

 

He should be on 9.1's. What's wrong with new drivers, you'd rather be a beta tester for Nvidia?