The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.

Dell Precision 7540 and 7740 Owner's Thread

Discussion in 'Dell Latitude, Vostro, and Precision' started by djdigitalhi, Aug 13, 2019.

  1. JustAnApprentice

    JustAnApprentice Newbie

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    6
    So after playing around in a clueless manner with ThrottleStop (TS) and HWinfo64, I found out the following stuff:

    - With the most recent bios version, the default power limits are 60W/107W (you can check by removing the .INI file in TS folder, restart, and open HWinfo64)
    - The FIRST time TS is opened (after installation), the default values in the TPL box inside TS is 75/107W (God knows where these numbers come from). After opening TS for this first time, open HWinfo64 again and check, the limits are still 60W/107W.

    Now I did the following steps subsequently:
    - Open FIVR box, uncheck "Disable and Lock Turbo Power Limits".
    - Open TPL box, modify the limits, press Apply, and press OK (for instance, change to 80W/120W here).
    - Then open HWinfo64 - the limits will now be 80W/120W, and if you run CinebenchR20, you'll see the same load reached in TS.

    Now the funny part begins :D:
    - Sleep, and turn on my laptop again.
    - Check in HWinfo64, the limits are now 60W/107W *despite the settings in TS being untouched.
    - The *meaning* of the "Disable and Lock Turbo Power Limits" box is now *flipped*!!! So now I *check* the box (as it is already being unchecked), type 80W/120W again in the TPL box, and press Apply, the new limits will be displayed correctly in HWinfo64.

    I just tried again and found that: as the "Disable and Lock Turbo Power Limits" is now checked, and as the TPL settings is just recently edited, the power limits remain unchanged from now despite the number of sleeps/turn on.

    My most reliable way to change the power limit is now: uncheck the "box", change the limits, sleep, check the "box", and change the limits again. Hope this silly trick help you guys :D
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
    syscrusher likes this.
  2. acemanhiflier

    acemanhiflier Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    16
    just wanted to check, if you opt for the aluminium lid, does the bottom base also change to aluminium?

    i found the built quality of the bottom base with carbon lid not that great...
     
  3. Aaron44126

    Aaron44126 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    874
    Messages:
    5,548
    Likes Received:
    2,058
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Pretty sure it is the same material but painted a lighter color.
     
    acemanhiflier likes this.
  4. Ionising_Radiation

    Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)

    Reputations:
    750
    Messages:
    3,242
    Likes Received:
    2,654
    Trophy Points:
    231
    @steeevan and @acemanhiflier, do you care to share the part number of your heatsinks? You can find out by going to this site, entering your service tag and then clicking on 'system configuration'.

    I'm inclined to believe the first batch of the Precision 7530 heatsinks are defective, and I'm intending to replace the heatsink...
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
    acemanhiflier likes this.
  5. acemanhiflier

    acemanhiflier Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    16
    you mean, it is not aluminium? arrgh... that will mean that the lid and base will be of different material types if you choose for Aluminium lid!!

    good that i opted for the carbon finish lid. plus the carbon finish should have better RF properties. have a WWAN in my config which seems to work very well. the WiFi also seems better than my XPS 15 2-in-1 (which is Aluminium).
     
  6. acemanhiflier

    acemanhiflier Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I checked the system configuration and this is what it says for the graphics card and heatsink: -

    upload_2019-12-5_10-24-10.png
     
    Ionising_Radiation likes this.
  7. Ionising_Radiation

    Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)

    Reputations:
    750
    Messages:
    3,242
    Likes Received:
    2,654
    Trophy Points:
    231
    @acemanhiflier, much obliged. For now, I've repasted the CPU and GPU, and removed the plastic washers, and pressed down the heatsink.

    I've experienced a remarkable drop in temperatures: at even full tilt of 4.1 GHz, the CPU does not throttle and temperatures maintain at 90 °C. The weird temperature differential is also gone. Now, to figure out how to get rid of the PL2 power limit, or at least make it longer.
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2019
    acemanhiflier likes this.
  8. Hopper82

    Hopper82 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    12
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Do you also set undervolt? If not, you can try with a first step of -100mV, that is almost the base step for every 8/9th gen i7/i9 and make another good difference in thermal improvement.
     
  9. Ionising_Radiation

    Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)

    Reputations:
    750
    Messages:
    3,242
    Likes Received:
    2,654
    Trophy Points:
    231
    An undervolt of –125 mV has always been there from the get-go.

    I now achieve a score of 1333 in CB R15, which is my highest ever. And this isn't even in an air-conditioned room. Ambient temps 29 °C.
     
  10. Hopper82

    Hopper82 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    12
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Seems a good step.
    Overall a good result I think, even because the heatsink performance on the 75X0 maybe is a little less than the one on the 77X0, due to space limits (not sure however, just considering).
     
Loading...

Share This Page