The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.

M6800 Owners' Thread

Discussion in 'Dell Latitude, Vostro, and Precision' started by billxt95, Nov 1, 2013.

  1. whitrzac

    whitrzac The orange end is cold...

    Reputations:
    497
    Messages:
    1,142
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    56
  2. notepek

    notepek Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    7
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    16
  3. whitrzac

    whitrzac The orange end is cold...

    Reputations:
    497
    Messages:
    1,142
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    56
    yes

    .................
     
  4. notepek

    notepek Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    7
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    16
    A couple of questions to those of you who understand the workings of memory modules better than me:

    If there are multiple MHz versions of the more or less same memory module, are there usually some fundamental structural differences between them, or is it more a matter of some just having better quality so that they are able to run at higher clock speeds (or can be overclocked higher)? I have understood that at least some CPU cores with different clock ratings are just basically picked from the same production line based on at which speed they happen to work reliably?

    Secondly, is it so that for a machine like M6800 which doesn't provide any BIOS options for memory settings it just gets the supported clock and timings information from the memory module itself, and tries to use the maximum available (that it supports), so in my case it tries to run 1866MHz memories with that speed and if they do not work properly it won't try (and there's no way to make it try) to run them at any lower setting? If that is the case I guess I could try that theory by inserting a couple of 1600MHz memories to the other slots so that it's forced to use the maximum common speed?

    I believe this conversation is a good indication that you shouldn't go for modules that are rated higher than supported as even in the best case you probably just have to pay more for them without actually getting any benefits if the laptop doesn't support them and instead there's a bigger risk that they won't work.
     
  5. RetSurfer

    RetSurfer Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Mine shipped today and I want to thank everyone for their contribution to this thread.

    A couple of questions;

    1) BIOS SATA settings (I understand needs to be done on first startup before OS loading), the manual says RAID (default) but I’ve read AHCI is a better setting if no RAID (I’m not going to run RAID). Has anyone changed this?

    2) MSATA, I’m a little confused on which one to purchase. Manual says SATA 2 but I’ve read SATA 3. Has anyone purchased one and would it be good as a scratch disc for Photoshop CS6?

    Thanks

    Mark
     
  6. notepek

    notepek Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    7
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    16
    According to HWINFO I have Liteon LMT-256M6M mSATA inside and it reports the drive controller to be Serial ATA 6Gb/s @ 6Gb/s. So based on that it seems to be SATA 3.

    That's my system disc and in addition I have a couple of regular RAID discs for data. My understanding is that mSATA discs usually are not quite as fast as their regular sized SSD counterparts but whether there's a significant difference, I don't know.
     
  7. RetSurfer

    RetSurfer Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Thank you, I'm looking at this one:

    Crucial M500 240GB mSATA Internal Solid State Drive CT240M500SSD

    I'm GUESSING, eek, it will fit.
     
  8. raston_89

    raston_89 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Just FYI, putting on a fresh win8 image and then upgrading to win 8.1, when in the dell extended battery life power plan battery bar sits between 8 to 9.5 watts :) Screen min brightness, light internet browsing and ms word. Not bad....
     
  9. landsome

    landsome Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    245
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Only have experience with M6600 and M6700, but I assume the touchpad is still Alps and pretty awful. To make two-finger gestures usable I had to disable 1-finger scroll, lower the sensitivity slider (i.e., make it more sensitive to pressure) and tone down the TouchGuard.

    Either should be fine in PS but go for SATA3 to enjoy up-to-date speed.

    When there is a difference - and often there is none - it's small and unnoticeable except in 'synthetic' tests. Personally, I would not bother.
     
  10. Michiko

    Michiko Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    41
    I have tested the Crucial CT240M500SSD3 in an M6800 and can confirm that it fits and works perfectly.

    I didn't run any benchmarks, but it was fast enough for me.
     
Loading...

Share This Page