The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.

Latitude E4200 weired CPU clock speed.

Discussion in 'Dell Latitude, Vostro, and Precision' started by lambition, Nov 4, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. lambition

    lambition Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I just checked CPU clock with CPU-Z on my Latitude E4200 with Core 2 Duo SU9400 and found something weired.

    It is 1.4GHz processor and the lowest clock speed it would go down to is 1197.1 MHz and it will go up to 1596.1 MHz.

    When I run this laptop with battery only or set power setting to power saver, the clock speed will stay at 1596.1 MHz and will not change. (actually over clocking it.)

    Another interesting thing is Core VID goes lower when clock speed is high and go higher when clock speed is low. It will be 0.875V at 1596.1 MHz and it will be 1.050V at 1197.1 MHz.

    Is this just a bug in CPU-Z or is this how it is supposed to work in new Speed Step?
     
  2. weirdo81622

    weirdo81622 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    86
    Messages:
    619
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I would say it's probably a bug in CPUZ. Try installing RMClock and see if that gives you different readings.
    THe SU9400 should have 3 speedstep levels - 1.4ghz, 1.2ghz, and 0.8ghz. It definitely won't go up to 1.6ghz, and the voltage shouldn't be higher at 1.6 than it is at 1.2.
    One possibility is that the processor is cutting the CLOCK in half, but the multiplier is actually increasing. Therefore, say, your CPU had a clock of 100mhz, and a multiplier of 14 (total arbitrary numbers), to get 1.4ghz. What I'm thinking is that to get to it to 1.2, it just cuts the multiplier to 12. However, maybe, to get to 800mhz, it increases the multiplier to 16 but cuts the clock in half, to 50mhz. That would explain the lower voltage.

    Either way, there's a 99% chance it's a software issue.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page