The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    changing amount of system ram to be shared with gphx card

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by mkarwin, Mar 30, 2008.

  1. mkarwin

    mkarwin Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    22
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i'm using vista sp1 hp 64bit (but that you might already know due to what i've been asking last 2 months :p ) and having jfl92 rig... that means gf8600mgt w/512mb of ram... my 4gb of ram is correctly recognized by the os and reported under my computer, however it starts to anger me as the card takes, besides its own 512mb of ram, somewhere near 1800mb of system ram... the ram that could have been used elsewhere :D and let's face it - what's the point of having 2300mb of ram for the vid card? especially one that i have :D there's none... so my question is - where can i set how much system ram can be shared by the card? after i start some of my work related apps i end up with somewhere near sub 100MB of ram free... that's really not good... i tried a few drivers for the card and now i'm on ones that MS update utility found... i was hoping it'll have a switch of some kind but no... can you help me? i hope so :D
     
    mkarwin, Mar 30, 2008
    #1
  2. kozzney

    kozzney Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    41
    Messages:
    565
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    That 1800MB of ram "taken" by the gfx card is only the max amount it will use; your OS will still have 1st priority to all of your RAM, including that 1800MB that the gfx card has supposedly reserved for itself. You don't have anything to worry about.
     
    kozzney, Mar 30, 2008
    #2
  3. mkarwin

    mkarwin Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    22
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    is that true? wouldn't that have any negative effects on managing the ram? after all - reserving, giving away, reserving... it all takes time, doesn't it?
     
    mkarwin, Mar 30, 2008
    #3
  4. qhn

    qhn Notebook User

    Reputations:
    1,654
    Messages:
    5,955
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    sure it does - questions are
    . what is ur "time" concern? nano, mili ...?
    . how would u measure the impact of "vista managing memory"?

    cheers ...
     
    qhn, Mar 30, 2008
    #4
  5. kozzney

    kozzney Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    41
    Messages:
    565
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I don't think it has any negative effects; I've got a 8400M GS that does the same thing-it reserves like 1500MB of my 4GB, but I've never seen any performance hits at all when I have a bunch of programs open. Also, the extra system RAM that the gfx card *may* use during gaming or graphics intensive stuff, it does not really help all that much with performance. The DDR3 on the graphics card is much much better
     
    kozzney, Mar 30, 2008
    #5
  6. ahl395

    ahl395 Ahlball

    Reputations:
    3,867
    Messages:
    8,218
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Well it depends on the speed of the RAM iguess. if you have 533MHz or above i wouldnt worry about it. In the rare occasion in might take the 1800MB, which it probably wont, as said, the OS has 1st priority. Especially with 4GB if memory, i wouldnt worry about it. But if you still are interested, a program like GPUz or RivaTuner, etc may have that ability to change the amount of VRAM, but im not sure.
     
    ahl395, Mar 30, 2008
    #6
  7. mkarwin

    mkarwin Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    22
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    well every piece of not needed operations is a bad thing i think :p and i know that this extra shared memory doesn't do much good... that's why i'd prefer the os to take some more ram for itslef rather than "waste" it for the card :D it's good to hear however that it is not really wasted :D

    but if you say i've nothing to worry about i'm happy to hear this :D
     
    mkarwin, Mar 30, 2008
    #7