The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Windows 8.x August, 2014 Market share

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by TANWare, Aug 31, 2014.

  1. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,548
    Messages:
    9,585
    Likes Received:
    4,997
    Trophy Points:
    431
  2. StormJumper

    StormJumper Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    579
    Messages:
    3,537
    Likes Received:
    488
    Trophy Points:
    151
    This is the best lie M$ can come up with? Users are going WIndows 7 and they seem to forget. Most isane W8 taking over XP when XP users most likely are going to Vista SP3 or Windows 7. Those numbers are so flawed it's not funny. Reason being XP is low people are leaving it duh....doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to know where the trend is going Windows 7 adoption not Windows 8 as M$ would like to say. StatCounter most likely a MOE paid by M$ to give out false information where the evidence shows W8 is a disaster in the making.
     
  3. Spartan@HIDevolution

    Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative

    Reputations:
    39,567
    Messages:
    23,559
    Likes Received:
    36,826
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I don't care what their market share is, to me, there is only one usable MS OS at the moment, Windows 7

    I cannot count the times that I formatted and installed Windows 8.1 to try and give it a chance. Everytime I install it, give it sometime, and something comes up that destroys my experience. It has improved a lot, but I am not accepting a new modern OS that gives me lower benchmarks in every test I've done
     
  4. StormJumper

    StormJumper Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    579
    Messages:
    3,537
    Likes Received:
    488
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Trust me your not the only one on this and most that tried and dumped W8 and went looking for W7 Machines did it on their own-most did have to tell them to do so. Even Corporations and Institutions are going to Windows 7 Enterprise that should tell anyone if they don't want W8 what makes it think for M$ that the everyday limited user will want W8 and deal with all the headaches and lost connections and lost time/money want a W8 machine. And don't mention 3rd party that makes W8 like W7 - just get W7 and get over it that's what I tell people if you want W7 get W7 want W8 stay with W8. All those changes from 3rd party to make it W7 puts your O/S in more security holes as W8 Mods don't protect your O/S that will be more secure just by itself even if it has problems itself. IMO
     
    Ferris23 likes this.
  5. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,548
    Messages:
    9,585
    Likes Received:
    4,997
    Trophy Points:
    431
    We still need to see other stats as well. I do not start these to be W8 bashing threads but informative threads where hopefully M$ starts to get things right for desktop users. At the least we al will know the history behind its deployment and the excuse "Windows 8 and metro were so well adopted" can not be used if the next iteration of Windows fails.
     
    alexhawker and Ferris23 like this.
  6. Spartan@HIDevolution

    Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative

    Reputations:
    39,567
    Messages:
    23,559
    Likes Received:
    36,826
    Trophy Points:
    931
    oh I didn't mean to start bashing it sorry if it sounded like that. Just saying, that to me personally, it is a big fail. As StormJumper said, people have to do more than 10 tweaks to get Windows 8 setup the way they like, so if one really wants it to look like 7, then he should just install Windows 7 and be over with it.

    Now I am a fast adapting person. I am open to change, be it at work, in life, or in computers. I have mastered navigating Windows 8 without even using any start menu 3rd party app and I actually like how fast you can access an app using metro as I just put the most apps I use on the metro screen. that is not my issue. Interface is not my problem. My problem is, MS claims that Windows 8 has better support for newer hardware, SSDs, CPUs, you name it! The only thing I see better in 8 is its built in defragmenter which doesn't defragment an SSD but sends TRIM commands to it, but benchmarking wise, I fail to see why a modern OS with better driver support and support for newer hardware gets beaten by a 7 year old or so OS (win 7) in every benchmark I've thrown at it.

    I wished they were able to fix this crippled OS with 8.1, or 8.1 Update 1, or 8.1 Update + August update, but it has failed each and every single time, it's like beating a dead horse
     
  7. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,548
    Messages:
    9,585
    Likes Received:
    4,997
    Trophy Points:
    431
  8. Rodster

    Rodster Merica

    Reputations:
    1,805
    Messages:
    5,043
    Likes Received:
    396
    Trophy Points:
    251
    I think one of the reasons for lower benchmark scores is that W8/8.1 uses very aggressive sleep/wake cycles on the CPU. IIRC and I linked an article it's like 10 times more the CPU is put to sleep and reawaken. Supposedly Windows 9 is going to be even more aggressive than Windows 8.
     
  9. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,548
    Messages:
    9,585
    Likes Received:
    4,997
    Trophy Points:
    431