The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Super-pi Test in dual core processors

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Carlos Guillén, Feb 11, 2007.

  1. Carlos Guillén

    Carlos Guillén Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I have a doubt about this test during the process to calculate pi with 2M digits. I use a widget "CPU meter" that always shows 50% during the test and without running anything else. My question is if Super-pi program use both cores of the processor or just only one like it seems to me?. You can see it in the attached image.


    One other thing, my laptop is a Vaio-N with WinXP loaded, so when i tested the first time Super-pi calculates 2M in 1m26s. Now since I used a patch for WinXP that allows to improve the use of both cores of the processor and other modifications on the boot.ini file that I read in another thread, well now Super-pi does 1m35s. Notice that in both tests my CPU meter shows 50%, but I feel my system is faster now although Super-pi show me the oposite. What It´s really happening?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    SuperPI is a single-threaded benchmark...it's good for only estimating how each core will perform in math/sci/engr applications.

    It is slower probably because that patch forces XP to allocate a few CPU cycles to optimizing the rest of the load between the two cores. That's where the performance loss on a single thread went, but why you multitasking system seems to perform faster.
     
  3. Gator

    Gator Go Gators!

    Reputations:
    890
    Messages:
    1,889
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Don't sweat it, night_2004 said it best. Those are still top of the line scores despite using only half of your processing power. Take pride in that :)
     
  4. Payback

    Payback Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Sorry, I'm not trying to hijack your thread, but what is this patch you are referring to?
     
  5. Carlos Guillén

    Carlos Guillén Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  6. plattnnum

    plattnnum Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    107
    Messages:
    592
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    has this been proven to increase performance?

    Thanks.
     
  7. Payback

    Payback Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  8. Carlos Guillén

    Carlos Guillén Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Yes, after I install the patch the overall system improved