any recommendation of
best (or better) smartphone for taking pictures??
I don't actually need digital camera or high price professional camera to take pictures
however most of the time I take pictures with my smartphone it's not focused, even though I always choose auto-mode and wait a couple of seconds and carefully hit the screen without my hands shaking the pictures are often not focused very well. It wastes a lot of time and effort
-
Apple's and Samsung's flagship phones are currently the two most consistently good in their performance.
Vasudev likes this. -
ok
-
Tinderbox (UK) BAKED BEAN KING
The old NOKIA 1020 has a 41mp camera with xenon and led flash, Though i dont expect you to buy it.
http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/nokia/nokia-lumia-1020
John. -
-
If you want a phone to receive text, calls and browse the web.....and you want THE BEST photos.....the NOKIA 1020 is it. The camera on that is on par with entry level DSLRS with kit lens. I owned one, the photos were AMAZING. Don't expect camera speed, but for static subjects The 1020 is KING in the smartphone imaging world. I own a iPhone 6s now, and the camera does not compare on image quality. However, there are many included options on the iPhone that are not on the 1020. Plus the accessory list for the iPhone is second to none.
Tinderbox (UK) and Vasudev like this. -
-
I'm waiting to see how good the Pixel 2 is.
-
Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative
This >>>
-
LG G6 hands down. Consider a previous G5 if the current too expensive for you. I've got G5 last October and it shoots better photos than mother's iPhone i6 or father's i7. Yup, we're kind of iFamily, but I'm a black sheep.
Check these to get an impression:
http://www.greenbot.com/article/319...mera-shootout-lg-g6-vs-samsung-galaxy-s8.html
http://www.phonearena.com/news/The-...-vs-LG-G6-vs-iPhone-7-vs-Google-Pixel_id93375Vasudev likes this. -
Starlight5 Yes, I'm a cat. What else is there to say, really?
@kenny1999 Iphone 7 Plus has the best camera as far as I read. Definitely beats Lumia 1020. Moto Z Hasselblad looks great on paper, but sucks in reality.
-
-
Vasudev likes this.
-
H.A.L. 9000 Occam's Chainsaw
If Google would actually implement OIS, I would recommend the Pixel hands down... but their HDR+ mode likes to completely crush shadows leaving almost no recoverable details in post. Meanwhile the S7/Edge output in RAW+JPG, so you can get a usable image immediately or if you'd like you can take that RAW through Lightroom and make something pretty amazing.
As for the LG, if you look at the image data... it's a dumpster fire. Blown out highlights, contrast issues, tint shift, and some pretty bad white balance issues. But that's the JPG quality. I've never looked at RAW from the G6. The one redeeming quality about the G6 in my opinion is that it doesn't use the crazy over-sharpening/noise reduction that Samsung likes to do in extreme situations. But then in RAW those are a non-issue.
This is a stellar example of what can be done with the S7 Edge...
S u n s e t by Farhat Memon, on Flickr
-
RED is making their own camera phone for Q1 '18. Concrete details, however, are scarce.
https://www.phonearena.com/news/Thi...camera-phone-with-holographic-display_id95768 -
H.A.L. 9000 Occam's Chainsaw
-
H.A.L. 9000 Occam's Chainsaw
Here's a random shot I took the other day. Nothing special done here except adjusting the highlights.
best smartphone for taking pictures?
Discussion in 'Smartphones and Tablets' started by kenny1999, Jun 3, 2017.