Reviews seem to say that memory usage is much improved. How true is this?
I don't really understand what people mean when they call Norton a resource hog. I've always used previous versions, and wondered whether it is slowing my laptop down just because it is enabled, or only when scanning something?
How much of a difference would there be between using Norton, Kaspersky and Avast! for example? Would it improve game performance? Or is the difference really only a small percentage...
My current subscription will end soon and I've seen a nice offer for Norton IS 2008. Does anybody want to give some feedback on it?
-
-
Why don't you give the others a try? Avast is free, and I'm pretty sure Kaspersky offers a free trial. FWIW, so does NOD.
Norton Internet Security 2008 - resource hog?
Discussion in 'Security and Anti-Virus Software' started by dannywanny, Jan 13, 2008.