The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Anti virus program

    Discussion in 'Security and Anti-Virus Software' started by cloudbyday, Jun 9, 2009.

  1. cloudbyday

    cloudbyday Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    50
    Messages:
    706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I've been looking at anti virus programs. I've been wandering what antivirus program would work on a laptop meaning that it wouldn't take a lot of memory bandwidth. I had some antivirus programs on our desktops that when you would perform a search or even an upgrade, you couldn't do anything else. I haven't gotten the laptop yet, so any suggestions would really help. I don't have to be a free anti virus ( I have looked at the avg antivirus though). The Eset Nod32 looks to be about what I want. Three websites, including their website, says that it doesn't use much memory bandwidth. Any insight?
     
  2. McGrady

    McGrady Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,400
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    We have a entire sub-forum dedicated to this.
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1046

    My vote for free- Avira AV
    If you want to pay- Nod32
     
  3. MidnightSun

    MidnightSun Emodicon

    Reputations:
    6,668
    Messages:
    8,224
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Norton Antivirus 2009 has tons of rebate deals that make the price $0 plus tax, unlike Eset. It uses even less system resources than Eset NOD32, which is certainly saying something. It also has more frequent updates (which are system-resource-invisible) than Eset.

    Or, if you want a firewall as well, Norton Internet Security 2009 is a good choice too. For me, it seems it typically uses a bit of extra memory as compared to NAV09.

    Either choice is very good, and I have not seen any impacts to my computer's performance before and after installing NIS09.
     
  4. cloudbyday

    cloudbyday Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    50
    Messages:
    706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I was thinking about getting the zone alarm firewall, or should I get Norton Internet Security
     
  5. Cin'

    Cin' Anathema

    Reputations:
    14,217
    Messages:
    15,406
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    466
    My vote is Avira AV 9 FTW, and again FTW... :D
    (and SuperAntiSpyware) :)


    Cin ;) :)
     
  6. Gophn

    Gophn NBR Resident Assistant

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    456
    there are many great free alternative for Internet Security that does a great jobs, as well as saves you money.

    I went over that a couple of times in this forum.

    If you want to spend money, try to avoid the infamously problems makers (Norton and McAfee suites).
     
  7. MidnightSun

    MidnightSun Emodicon

    Reputations:
    6,668
    Messages:
    8,224
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    231
    I've tried ZoneAlarm before (in addition to McAfee, Kaspersky, ESET NOD32 and ESET Smart Security, AVG, and now, NIS09). It uses much more resources than NIS09, but its firewall is quite nice.

    I am going to venture to say that you have never tried Norton NAV/NIS 2009. Norton products from before 2009 (I'm referring to 2008 in particular) were one of the most bloated system protection suites out there, slowing your system down to a crawl and adding some 30+ seconds to boot time.

    NIS 2009, however, was completely rewritten from the earlier Norton products, to be much more streamlined, and at the same time, more secure. If you check third-party antivirus ratings, you can see Norton consistently ranks in at least the top 5, while using far less system resources.

    Another Norton problem of the past, the numerous false positives, has also been more or less fixed. The detection engine seems much more precise than before, in my experiences.
     
  8. Melody

    Melody How's It Made Addict

    Reputations:
    3,635
    Messages:
    4,174
    Likes Received:
    419
    Trophy Points:
    151
    I prefer Comodo's Firewall(without Defense+) to Zone Alarm's.

    As for Anti-viruses, Avira is a nice one indeed.

    Paying I'd go with Kapersky personally because of its special way of viral detection over the common ones. At least that's what my hacker(and virus making) friend told me >.>
     
  9. Cin'

    Cin' Anathema

    Reputations:
    14,217
    Messages:
    15,406
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    466
    What ever you decide..the freeware is just as good..at the paid AV Software.
    (You literally can load your lappy what you want with great freeware!) :D

    Cin ;) :)
     
  10. Melody

    Melody How's It Made Addict

    Reputations:
    3,635
    Messages:
    4,174
    Likes Received:
    419
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Yeah honestly you don't need that much more than what the freewares give you for everyday home use.
     
  11. Silas Awaketh

    Silas Awaketh Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    891
    Messages:
    1,676
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    cloudbyday, NOD32 is the best of the lot, and takes the least amount of memory. It is not free though, so take out yer wallet and spend some of that money.

    IMVHO, do NOT touch anything by Norton. Just look around on the net about it. After a few days, you'd wish that you'd rather have a virus than Norton, and when you'd want to remove it, you won't be able to.

    Also, you do not need a firewall, again, IMVHO. Just get a good antivirus, and 2 anti-malwares (a-squared and MBAM, free editions of both), and you'd be fine.
     
  12. cloudbyday

    cloudbyday Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    50
    Messages:
    706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I think I am going to get Norton, it seems that a lot of places like cnet and pcmag likes Norton.
     
  13. Silas Awaketh

    Silas Awaketh Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    891
    Messages:
    1,676
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's the worst of the lot.
     
  14. coolguy

    coolguy Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    805
    Messages:
    4,679
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Have you even used any Norton 2009 product?. They are the best.
     
  15. Gophn

    Gophn NBR Resident Assistant

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Norton 360 and the latest Norton's are much better than it used to be... but when you want to remove it from your computer... is when you might run into obstacles.

    go with whatever you want, just make sure that it stays up to date and still active (like paying up for yearly fees).
     
  16. Silas Awaketh

    Silas Awaketh Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    891
    Messages:
    1,676
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ROFL! Yes, I have.
     
  17. DetlevCM

    DetlevCM Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I've been very happy with Kaserpsky.

    It lso runs well on a 4,5 year old laptop with 512MB RAM on XP :D
    (Its withmy grandfather)
     
  18. Aeris

    Aeris Otherworldly

    Reputations:
    474
    Messages:
    805
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    31
    If you want an antivirus that is resource-friendly, then Norton 2009, Nod32, Vipre or even Panda Cloud are the antiviruses for you.