The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    AV-TEST Windows 10: April 2021

    Discussion in 'Security and Anti-Virus Software' started by Spartan@HIDevolution, Jun 1, 2021.

  1. Spartan@HIDevolution

    Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative

    Reputations:
    39,604
    Messages:
    23,561
    Likes Received:
    36,864
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Papusan, hacktrix2006 and Mr. Fox like this.
  2. Mr. Fox

    Mr. Fox BGA Filth-Hating Elitist

    Reputations:
    37,235
    Messages:
    39,339
    Likes Received:
    70,655
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Papusan and Spartan@HIDevolution like this.
  3. Papusan

    Papusan Jokebook's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on Filthy

    Reputations:
    42,712
    Messages:
    29,847
    Likes Received:
    59,649
    Trophy Points:
    931
    There is still a few that went cheapo and paid less than the full fee :) Some companies prefer the cheap route as you know :hi:
     
    Spartan@HIDevolution and Mr. Fox like this.
  4. Papusan

    Papusan Jokebook's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on Filthy

    Reputations:
    42,712
    Messages:
    29,847
    Likes Received:
    59,649
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Spartan@HIDevolution likes this.
  5. Mr. Fox

    Mr. Fox BGA Filth-Hating Elitist

    Reputations:
    37,235
    Messages:
    39,339
    Likes Received:
    70,655
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I recently tried BullGuard (it came included free from ASUS with the Crosshair VIII motherboard) and the GUI was disgusting to look at and very awkward to navigate. To put it bluntly, I thought it was garbage.

    I also recently tried BitDefender and it was fine other that it was consuming far too much memory and seemed overly bloated. The GUI was decent though.

    I recently tried Kaspersky and removed it after a couple of days. They've made changes to it that really annoyed me. It was also more bloated than when I last tried it several years ago. The are headquartered in Moscow, and I can't think of a scenario other than a company being based in China that should be viewed with a greater deal of suspicion and distrust.

    I don't like any security software and don't really need any. I can see Defender being a popular option because it is easy to configure and works well enough. It is included with Windows and requires no subscription. That is actually very compelling. I absolutely DO NOT trust Micro$lop, but I don't know that trusting them is any more stupid than trusting a security company that is headquartered in a country whose governments do not have the best interests of citizens in other countries at heart and are actively engaged in cyber warfare. I think trusting foreign countries to not do naughty things when you're not paying attention is less than smart. That is like leaving the fox in charge of the henhouse.

    Trusting Micro$lop seems like a somewhat lesser evil, but primarily because they are selfish and only care about what is best for them. I doubt they are conducting cyber warfare against North American citizens on behalf of the US Government, but anything is possible.

    I think the one that bothers me the least is ESET Antivirus. I am not sure how I feel about trusting a company based in Slovakia, but at least they are viewed as an ally to North American governments and most of their allied nations.

    Because they are based in the US, Symantec (Norton) might be the only one that it makes sense for me to give any trust to, but I hate their bloated products. I haven't tried using them in quite a few years. Maybe I should investigate what they offer, but I doubt they've become less bloated in time. The opposite seems to be the case for all of them. Computers are more powerful and have more resources than they used to, and it seems like all software developers abuse that because they can get away with it. Part of that is having to make everything idiot-proof to accommodate the lowest common denominators when it comes to technical knowledge.

    The bottom line is, I think no "security solutions provider" should be viewed as reliable or trustworthy. On an "all things considered" basis, I can't identify any that are deserving of trust, and none of them can fix stupidity, dishonesty and bad habits. Nor do they do anything to rid us of the criminal minds that seek to harm anyone that is vulnerable. Our biggest problem is the depravity of the human race and the naturally nefarious nature of mankind.
     
    4W4K3 and Papusan like this.
  6. Papusan

    Papusan Jokebook's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on Filthy

    Reputations:
    42,712
    Messages:
    29,847
    Likes Received:
    59,649
    Trophy Points:
    931
    And you can't trust on Microsoft either. Today's tech is either screwed up in birth or driven by incompetence. Or both.

    Microsoft Defender Version 1.353.1874.0 version 1.353.1874.0 incorrectly reports Emotet borncity.com

    [​IMG]
    A brief note for administrators. Microsoft Defender reportes a PowEmotoet.SB infection has been blocked and quarantined and possibly triggers Microsoft Office? This is a false alarm, which was triggered by an update of the signature files to version 1.353.1874.0. Here is some information on what is known so far.

    Addendum: Bleeping Computer colleagues also report the same issue here. A week ago, there has been also an issue with Defender, see Windows Server 2019/2022: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint fails after Nov. 2021 updates.