The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    FPS Issues with Razer Blade 15

    Discussion in 'Razer' started by philfna, Feb 3, 2019.

  1. philfna

    philfna Notebook Evangelist NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    160
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I got the Razer Blade 15 with the 1060MQ, and I love it other then the FPS seems low. It has the 144hz screen, and i got an external 144hz screen as well. I can't seem to break 70 FPS on the new monitor plugged through thunderbolt, and with gsync on. It is very infuriating as my MSI with a 970M is getting 120 FPS on a regular basis with same setup...any thoughts?
     
  2. Joikansai

    Joikansai Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    254
    Messages:
    1,663
    Likes Received:
    704
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Its TB3 port connected directly to cpu if you want to get 144Hz use mini DP to DP, that port is to dGPU and can run g sync as well.
     
  3. Raidriar

    Raidriar ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)

    Reputations:
    1,708
    Messages:
    5,820
    Likes Received:
    4,311
    Trophy Points:
    431
    No it isn't, TB3 is routed to the PCH which then transfers to the CPU. Only in Alienware graphics amp are the PCIe lanes routed directly to the CPU
     
  4. Joikansai

    Joikansai Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    254
    Messages:
    1,663
    Likes Received:
    704
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Yes it’s through pch to cpu not gpu, that what I meant. You can get as well high refresh rate more than 60Hz through it but DP on Blade 15 offers better since it’s to gpu and support g sync and 144Hz or maybe more, that’s a better solution than using usb c port.