The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    Apple Updates MacBook Pro Line for 2011 Discussion

    Discussion in 'Notebook News and Reviews' started by Jerry Jackson, Feb 24, 2011.

  1. Bog

    Bog Losing it...

    Reputations:
    4,018
    Messages:
    6,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Wow, why are people complaining about the lack of discrete graphics on the 13"? Anyone who has seen the size of the motherboard on the MBP 13" knows that its physically impossible. The graphics are terrible; big deal, thats not even a low-priority design goal for the product.
     
    Bog, Mar 5, 2011
    #51
  2. Quicklite

    Quicklite Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    158
    Messages:
    1,576
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Good to see Apple still does 1920x1200 screen :D if I could only afford it.
     
    Quicklite, Mar 6, 2011
    #52
  3. panthermark

    panthermark Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    $2200? That is a lot of loot to spend......
     
    panthermark, Mar 6, 2011
    #53
  4. operaman

    operaman Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Got the new 17" with the antiglare screen and 2.3 ghz processor. LOVE it. The screen is worth it alone...
     
    operaman, Mar 8, 2011
    #54
  5. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    The screen is great... for a 6-bit TN panel, but definitely not worth the cost of retaining a 16:10 aspect ratio.
     
    sgogeta4, Mar 9, 2011
    #55
← Previous page