The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Apple MacBook Pro Now Shipping and a Valentine's Day Processor Speed Bump

    Discussion in 'Notebook News and Reviews' started by Andrew Baxter, Feb 14, 2006.

  1. Andrew Baxter

    Andrew Baxter -

    Reputations:
    4,365
    Messages:
    9,029
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    216

    The Apple MacBook Pro is now shipping this week to many anxiously awaiting customers that placed orders weeks ago for this anticipated Core Duo based notebook. Furthermore, Apple is showing the Valentine's Day love by bumping the processor speed across the line by now offering 1.83GHz for the basic $2,000 edition, 2.0 GHz for the $2,499 enhanced MacBook and an option to upgrade to a 2.16GHz for an extra $300 on the top configuration model.

    [​IMG]

    The $2,000 entry-level MacBook used to be 1.67GHz and the enhanced $2,499 edition used to be 1.83GHz so that means for the same price you're getting a one notch faster Intel Core Duo processor. Not a bad deal. If you ordered ahead of time when the configurations reflected slow speeds, you will also get this speed bump. The $300 upgrade to a 2.16GHz is only available if you select the 2.0GHz configuration from Apple.com, from there you will see an option to upgrade the processor.

     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 12, 2015
  2. RadcomTxx

    RadcomTxx Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    101
    Messages:
    873
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Hopefully this satifisfies everyone that was upset that there wasn't a 2.0 ghz processor in it. and 300$ for 160 mhz seems quite pricey to me.
     
  3. Andrew Baxter

    Andrew Baxter -

    Reputations:
    4,365
    Messages:
    9,029
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    216
    that's what I thought, who the heck is going to pay $300 for a 160MHz faster processor? I guess somebody that needs to have the fastest and the best, just 'cause.
     
  4. Eliwood

    Eliwood Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    161
    Messages:
    718
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Well, if you look at the price difference between the highest and the second highest in general (I'm just quoting the Merom prices), it's about right.

    T7600 -- 2.33GHz, $640
    T7400 -- 2.16GHz, $420
    T7200 -- 2.0GHz, $295
    T5600 -- 1.83GHz, $240

    That's a $220 difference in raw price already, so $300 isn't a stretch. I don't see this as being any more of a gouging than memory prices.
     
  5. Sowelu

    Sowelu Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Yes, that price difference (for the slight speed increase) has been the norm for most PC notebooks when going for the max configuration. It's the 'gotta have the best and fastest' premium. Not sure why people are raising a brow now that Apple is in the same game with the same chip offerings and pricing.