"What's notable here is how badly the TL-58 really murders the T5250; that extra 400MHz on the core pays off in spades here."
I think this is a little violent!
-
Wow, and all this time I thought the TL-58 was slower tha the T5250. In fact, I thought it was even slower than the Pentium Dual-core T2330. Oh how was I wrong. I can't be happier with my recent Extensa 5420 purchase.
-
How did you reach that conclusion? The TL58 was slower than the T5250 (barely most of the times though) in all benches except the synthetic wPrime. If you add the platform part (as in integrated cards), then the AMD pulls away in gaming performance. But the CPU is still slower. To be fair though, the AMD is likely cheaper, and a better buy if you're not doing anything cpu intense (and you're getting an integrated gpu).
-
Nice piece of work! Thanks!
AMD Versus Intel Mobile Processor Review
Discussion in 'Notebook News and Reviews' started by Dustin Sklavos, Dec 21, 2007.