The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    wireless N cards

    Discussion in 'Networking and Wireless' started by clusty1, Nov 18, 2007.

  1. clusty1

    clusty1 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Hey,

    Looking at the current internal laptop wireless N cards and was curious about your opinion. The choice is between

    intel 4965
    atheros ar5007
    broadcom N

    I am leaning towards the atheros as they always had native linux open source support. Anyone have any good/bad experiences with any of them?

    Also my notebook is a sony SZ420, it has a miniPCI-e port. Anything else I should consider regarding the compatibility?
     
  2. tebore

    tebore Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    55
    Messages:
    521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Broadcom is the worst. All of their network cards have terrible driver support. Most of the time they just drop support. Many HP Laptops out there with older broadcom cards won't support WPA2 because of lack of driver support.
     
  3. clusty1

    clusty1 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I am leaning towards the atheros since they always have open source support and they support one of best packet injections :D. So far the linux kernel does not support atheros be default.

    Clusty
     
  4. tebore

    tebore Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    55
    Messages:
    521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I've always had good luck with atheros card. They are extra sensitive and usually have the best transmit power.
     
  5. aan310

    aan310 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    738
    Messages:
    3,811
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    106
    well, i have a 3945 and my sis's artheros wireless g works better, so id go with artheros
     
  6. zfactor

    zfactor Mastershake

    Reputations:
    2,894
    Messages:
    11,134
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    455
    def atheros no question asked imo
     
  7. kl5167

    kl5167 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    56
    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Search some of the fourms and see which one is having more problems and then go with the other. But I have had good luck with both in the past, I tend to lean towards the atheros but have had good luck with intel chipsets as well. But do some research as well and see which has the best support now.
     
  8. clusty1

    clusty1 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The card I was looking at is labeled as Toshiba.
    Think it should be compatible with the standard chipset driver?

    Also the guy mentions that the card is not compatible with IBM/Dell notebooks but did not respond to my question as to why?
    Any idea why this might be?
    Space maybe?
     
  9. zfactor

    zfactor Mastershake

    Reputations:
    2,894
    Messages:
    11,134
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    455
    atheros is the manufacture of all their cards they simply get rebranded for whoever the reseller is.. some of the ibm lenovo's check to see if its a lenovo branded card but dell does not do this any longer as far as i know