The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Wi-Fi standards face patent threat

    Discussion in 'Networking and Wireless' started by TLarsen, Nov 20, 2007.

  1. TLarsen

    TLarsen Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    There is a long drawn out lawsuit in place affecting some manufacturers ability to deliver Wi-Fi product from their warehouses. This also affects the release and finalization of Draft-N, and if the suit is won, will affect any manufacturer of Wi-Fi equipment with higher prices due to the licensing fees they will have to pay.

    According to a ZDNET article referenced below, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia's national science agency, holds a patent on Wi-Fi and filed a lawsuit against Buffalo Technology, which is fighting CSIRO's patent claims. In 2005, Dell, Intel, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft and Netgear sued CSIRO in federal court in San Francisco to invalidate the patent. The patent describes the implementation of several aspects of the 802.11a and 802.11g wireless standards developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).

    ZDNET has the most detailed explanation I have found. You can see it here.

    Buffalo Technology has been hit hard by the suit, as you can read here.

    As Buffalo states in the above link,
    "CSIRO's lawsuits are against the entire wireless LAN industry and could affect the supply of wireless LAN products by any manufacturer, not just Buffalo. The entire industry is resisting CSIRO's attempts to enjoin the sale of wireless LAN products. Recently, Microsoft, 3COM Corporation, SMC Networks, Accton Technology Corporation, Intel, Atheros Communications, Belkin International, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Nortel Networks, Nvidia Corporation, Oracle Corporation, SAP AG, Yahoo, Nokia, and the Consumer Electronics Association filed briefs in support of Buffalo's position that injunctive relief is inappropriate in this case."

    Other suits may follow. The net result is if you can afford Draft-N equipment now, get it. One day it may be ratified, and the distance and speed throughput available today are great if you need to do intra-network large (several hundred megabytes) file transfers or video streaming.

    If you are of a more cautious nature, wait to see how the dust settles on this lawsuit and how it affects Wi-Fi product pricing.
     
  2. WackyT

    WackyT Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    906
    Messages:
    1,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Sounds like Rambus all over again. Adoption of a global standard should automatically invalidate any patents.