The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Intel Wifi cards - range comparison question

    Discussion in 'Networking and Wireless' started by LoneWolf15, Feb 28, 2011.

  1. LoneWolf15

    LoneWolf15 The Chairman

    Reputations:
    976
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I have a fleet of Laitude D630 laptops that we use as a wireless lab. We have recently switched from having access points on the carts that house the computers themselves to having building-wide WLANs. Coverage according to our site-surveys seems to be good, but we are having more frequent dropouts in wireless connectivity.

    Our laptops have the older Intel 3945ABG cards. I am contemplating switching to slightly newer (they're the least expensive option, and I'm on a budget) Intel 4965AGN cards, which would add both 802.11N and MIMO functions. I'm wondering --has anyone ever seen a range comparison done between, say the Intel 3945, 4965, 5100/5300, etc. cards? While the new features are nice, I don't wish to spend a few hundred dollars only to find I'm no better off than before.

    Additional notes: We're using Cisco (enterprise, not Linksys-by-Cisco) access points. We have the latest Intel drivers, and the cards are set to maximum performance in that driver software. The laptops are running XP SP3.
     
  2. downloads

    downloads No, Dee Dee, no! Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,729
    Messages:
    8,722
    Likes Received:
    2,230
    Trophy Points:
    331
    I don't recall such a test. There's a general opinion that Intel 5300 is far better than previous Intel cards and there's a comparison test here that Intel won (although against non-Intel opposition).
    If 5300 is not too expensive it's probably the best reasonably priced card.
     
  3. LoneWolf15

    LoneWolf15 The Chairman

    Reputations:
    976
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Unfortunately, it's 2-3 times the price of the 4965AGN. I'm kind of down to that and the 5100 (available for about the same price), but the extra channels of the 4965 are appealing.

    I agree that I'd buy the 5300 if price weren't an issue. Since it is, I'm working on making sure that I actually get enough out of the 4965AGN cards to justify what I'm doing, before I do it.
     
  4. downloads

    downloads No, Dee Dee, no! Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,729
    Messages:
    8,722
    Likes Received:
    2,230
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Although technically 5100 is almost identical to 5300 it is also notorious for causing problems so given the choice I'd go for 4965.
    4965 doesn’t like hidden SSIDs though- it doesn't seem to be able to reconnect to some APs that use hidden SSID and it seems APs are not to blame here.
     
  5. LoneWolf15

    LoneWolf15 The Chairman

    Reputations:
    976
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Our SSIDs aren't hidden, so no issue there.

    I can get used 4965AGN cards for about $13 apiece, as opposed to the 5300 cards (around $28-30 each), so the answer is pretty clear, then. Thanks for the input.