The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Help with internet

    Discussion in 'Networking and Wireless' started by AndyxLui, Jan 6, 2010.

  1. AndyxLui

    AndyxLui Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    My laptop(asus g51j) runs at around 20-30 kb with wireless. When I use a LAN cable hooked directly to the router it hovers around 100 kb. Is this natural or is there anyway to solve this.
     
  2. AndyxLui

    AndyxLui Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    oh hey sorry, I just tested the speed out by downloading the same thing with the wireless and then with the wired.
     
  3. AndyxLui

    AndyxLui Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I just tested it with speedtest.net. Uhh I got 0.11 m/b downloads with 70 ping on wireless. 0.83 m/b downloads with 59 ping on wire. Also, am I being ripped off by verizon? I pay 80 for both the phone line and internet. I see other people complain about 350 kb and that just amazes me.
     
  4. hceuterpe

    hceuterpe Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    111
    Messages:
    380
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    No DSL (I assume DSL and not FiOS) highly depends on many factors like the length of your POTS subscriber loop (distance to CO), overall wiring quality and the speed you are provisioned for.
    If any of these are less than ideal, the blame is on you. This is a major drawback of DSL and that system is built on wiring that predates the technology significantly and lacks any sort of performance guarantee.

    Also you should consider using the proper terminology. 0.11 m/b and 0.83 m/b is meaningless. You should either describe results as Kbps, or KBps (bits, b vs bytes, B)