The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Faster than Gig-E

    Discussion in 'Networking and Wireless' started by pitz, Apr 21, 2017.

  1. pitz

    pitz Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    56
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    66
    There's some new networking standards which use Gig-E-compatible wiring, but can deliver 2-5 gigabits/sec throughput.

    Any laptop vendors incorporating such into their products yet?
     
    hmscott likes this.
  2. alexhawker

    alexhawker Spent Gladiator

    Reputations:
    500
    Messages:
    2,540
    Likes Received:
    792
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Standard name?

    Guessing nope.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  3. downloads

    downloads No, Dee Dee, no! Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,729
    Messages:
    8,722
    Likes Received:
    2,230
    Trophy Points:
    331
    There is such an intermediate standard which might I add is a great idea. It can deliver 2.5 Gbps on Cat 5E cables and 5 Gbps on Cat 6 cables - it's this.
    I haven't seen it implemented in any notebooks and I guess choice of routers/switches would be severely limited as well but that would be something I'd like to see as full 10 GBe is way to expensive to implement for most.
     
    Aroc, alexhawker and hmscott like this.
  4. pitz

    pitz Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    56
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Yeah, my 10-year-old D830 can saturate Gig-E, and it seems weird that my much newer laptop runs into the same limitations. I use Ethernet for backups and for iSCSI. With the much faster/larger SSDs I can install in the new one, and faster processors, you think the networking would have kept up, but it hasn't.
     
    Starlight5 likes this.