Both are 3x3.
The Intel is 802.11n and the Azurewave CB160H is 802.11ac
I have the Intel 6300 installed in my CF31 Toughbook using 3 Taoglas antennas.
My main usage is travel and parking lot free wifi.
I know the 802.11ac is faster but which card has better range? Which card is more sensitive to weak signals?
link to antennas
http://www.taoglas.com/product/freedom-fxp831-2-44-9-6-0ghz-flex-pcb-antenna-ipex-mhfi/
![]()
-
-
Starlight5 Yes, I'm a cat. What else is there to say, really?
-
Thanks. I was aware of that. I can get adaptor pigtails for cheap. I will replace the entire cable or antenna if needed.
The CB160H has mhf4 antenna connectors and the Intel uses U.FL.TomJGX likes this. -
And what have we found out about sensitivity between the two??
I have the 6300 from you and a pair of Taoglas antennas that will be 'extras' once i get the cables for the new AW card w/Taoglas antennas. I was thinking of putting them into one of the CF31s I have up for sale and testing them side by side. -
A side by side test sounds great
CB160H vs Intel 6300
Discussion in 'Networking and Wireless' started by Shawn, Mar 24, 2017.