The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Adding a 802.11n router to a home network

    Discussion in 'Networking and Wireless' started by espett, Dec 23, 2010.

  1. espett

    espett Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hello,

    I just got a new computer that is equipped with a wireless-n network card. I have a DSL connection and the network in the house is 802.11b/g. The gateway is a Motorola and the router and modem are the same device.

    If I were to take connect one of the four ports on the Motorola to a new wireless-n router will it there be interference or conflicts from running two networks? How can I do this properly to minimize any potential problems?

    I was thinking of gettting one of the cheap wireless-n routers on the market:

    Cisco-Linksys WRT160N

    or

    D-Link DIR-601


    What is the advantage of getting a more expensive one like this:

    D-Link DAP-2553


    Thanks in advance for the help!
     
  2. blue68f100

    blue68f100 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,020
    Messages:
    3,439
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    You can turn your second router into a AP just by disabling DHCP on the LAN side. I also assign a static IP to the new router that is outside the DHCP range issued by the upstream router. By connecting the 2 routers together LAN-LAN your good to go. The upstream router will handle the dhcp for the downstream router. I would set the downstream AP up as N only since you already have the b/g covered. Now if you get a dual band you can operate the 11n in the 5ghz band and not have interference with the lower 2.4ghz used by b/g.

    So if you go with a dual band router you have the un-cluttered 5ghz band at your dispose.

    Take a look at Real Help For Your Small Network - SmallNetBuilder for further detail and performace of the routers.
     
  3. espett

    espett Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Will there be a noticeable difference in performance on the 5ghz band?
     
  4. SoundOf1HandClapping

    SoundOf1HandClapping Was once a Forge

    Reputations:
    2,360
    Messages:
    5,594
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Depends. If you have a lot of 2.4GHz noise, the cleaner 5GHz band will have less interference. By that token, however, if you don't have a lot of other wireless devices around you might not see an improvement since the 2.4Hz band is mostly free as well.

    Also, over the same distances and transmit power, 5Ghz has less range and penetrating power than 2.4GHz.
     
  5. flipfire

    flipfire Moderately Boss

    Reputations:
    6,156
    Messages:
    11,214
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    466
    I would choose the WRT160N between your list (assuming its a version 3). You should opt for the dual band if your in a wifi congested area and all channels are taken. (Use inSSIDer to check networks around you)
     
  6. downloads

    downloads No, Dee Dee, no! Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,729
    Messages:
    8,722
    Likes Received:
    2,230
    Trophy Points:
    331
    All in all any wireless upgrade from b/g to n makes sense only if you plan to transfer a lot of files between computers on the LAN or your DSL connection is equal to or faster than roughly 20mbps.
    If you want to upgrade though- I agree with flipfire- WRT160N is the best choice.
     
  7. espett

    espett Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    After running the ipconfig command I get:

    Default Gateway: 192.168.1.254
    DHCP Server: 192.168.1.254

    On the OLD router I get:

    IP Address: 192.168.1.254
    DHCP Starting IP Address: 192.168.1.1
    DHCP Ending IP Address: 192.168.1.253

    I have disabled DHCP on the NEW router but I am not quite sure what to set the IP address to. Right now it is the same as on the OLD router...

    Thanks!
     
  8. flipfire

    flipfire Moderately Boss

    Reputations:
    6,156
    Messages:
    11,214
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Modem Router - 192.168.1.1
    AP - 192.168.1.2
    DHCP pool - 192.168.1.3 - 254
     
  9. espett

    espett Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Should the cable from the OLD router be plugged into WAN port or one of the LAN ports in the NEW router?
     
  10. flipfire

    flipfire Moderately Boss

    Reputations:
    6,156
    Messages:
    11,214
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Both will work.

    You might as well use the WAN port so it will free up a LAN port.

    If you use the second router as an WAP only, you might need to select a "WAN port to switch" setting.
     
  11. blue68f100

    blue68f100 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,020
    Messages:
    3,439
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    May or may not, you will have to give it a try. If it does not work just plug into lan port.