The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    3 MB Cap on Wireless?

    Discussion in 'Networking and Wireless' started by jlells01, May 23, 2007.

  1. jlells01

    jlells01 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Have a 10 MB cable connection, and when I run CAT5 to either the modem or router, my download speeds are as such:

    [​IMG]

    When I run wireless though, it goes to this:

    [​IMG]

    Have even tried a couple of different routers (to no avail)...what's up with this? Is there a 3MB cap on 802.11g wireless?

    Thanks
     
  2. WackyT

    WackyT Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    906
    Messages:
    1,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    How many other computers on the wireless?
    What wireless router are you using?
    Are you using the latest firmware for your router, and latest driver for your wireless card?
     
  3. jlells01

    jlells01 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Zero.

    Linksys WRT54G.

    Yes for both.
     
  4. vermicious

    vermicious Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Your terminology is a little off. You don't have a 10MB connection, you have a 10Mb connection, huge difference. 1 B (byte) = 8 b (bits). Internet provider speed is usually measured in bits, but data on computers is usually measured in bytes.

    Anyway, a 54G router has a theoretical maximum speed of 54Mb per second. Realistically, transfer rates are around 19Mb per second. Right now, you're transferring at around 3.5Mb, which is a little below the typical speed for 11B (theoretical maximum of 11Mb/s but really 4Mb/s). 3.5 is much closer to 4 than it is to 19, so I'm guessing for whatever reason, your router is broadcasting in 11B mode. Check router settings.

    If you read the wireless FAQ that's been stickied, it sounds like you either have your router broadcasting B only speeds, or you are broadcasting a mixed signal (both B and G). If there is a computer on your network that is going at B speeds, ALL your computers drop to B speed. The solution? Force your router to go into G only mode then try again.
     
  5. WackyT

    WackyT Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    906
    Messages:
    1,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Have you tried testing with WEP/WPA turned off?
     
  6. jlells01

    jlells01 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Thanks for the reply.

    The router is broadcasting on "G-Only".

    Computer is a E1505 with the 1390 wireless.

    As aforementioned, I tried a Belkin router before this one...had the same issue (10mb wired, 3mb wireless).
     
  7. jlells01

    jlells01 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Yes...same speed (give or take a very small amount)
     
  8. WackyT

    WackyT Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    906
    Messages:
    1,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I'd have to say the issue is with your wireless card, or noise on the channel you're using then.
     
  9. jlells01

    jlells01 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I've tried everything (including trying different channels, new firmware, etc.) and can't figure out what the issue is...in reality though, you don't even notice the difference when just browsing the 'net.

    For example - the difference in download speeds:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  10. blue68f100

    blue68f100 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,020
    Messages:
    3,439
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Your for getting 1 thing, 11g is 1/2 duplex so after overhead.

    I'm using a USR setup /125mbps, I get download speeds of 3MB/sec. Not great but better than yours. But is the price you pay for mobility.

    Also remember that most hoster limit bandwidth to ~200kbps.
     
  11. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
  12. vermicious

    vermicious Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Try going to a friend's house and playing with their equipment as well as your laptop and compare speeds. It could be interference in your house's location or your laptop card.
     
  13. jlells01

    jlells01 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Update: Well, after trying everything I could think of (including ideas mentioned here), I pretty much gave up on the notion of achieving higher speeds out of my wireless connection…

    Just yesterday though, I decided to give a “system optimization” tool a try. This was completely unrelated to the wireless speed issue, more so just simple curiosity, to see what (if anything) one could do to “speed up” an already efficient machine.

    This is the program I tried: http://www.auslogics.com/boost-speed/index.shtml

    I certainly wasn’t pleased with its changes to my system (actually slowed things down!), so the program was subsequently deleted, but it actually did something to lift the wireless bandwidth restriction I was encountering and let me receive the full-throughput of the connection!

    [​IMG]

    Problem solved (wish I knew what the actual issue was)!
     
  14. Zoomastigophora

    Zoomastigophora Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    76
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Maybe it was Window's TCP/IP settings?
     
  15. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Could have been a MTU setting or something along those lines that was set lower on the wireless connection than it was on the wired (which would basically increase the TCP/IP overhead, and kill the performance of wireless). Glad it's working for you now, though.