The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    suggestions for triple boot

    Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by ktang, Sep 22, 2009.

  1. ktang

    ktang Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I have a Lenovo R61 14.1" with discrete graphics (nVidia Quadros 140M) Q8300, 4GB RAM, 500GB hard drive, fingerprint reader, etc.

    I've broken up the hard drive as follows currently:
    100GB Windows 7 (currently installed)
    250GB Storage (formatted for NTFS, meant for cross-OS usage)
    115GB open space (unpartitioned)

    I plan on installing Ubuntu 9.04 (or waiting until 9.10) as well as Arch Linux onto the 115GB open space.

    The question I have is, if i were to share my /home directory between arch and ubuntu, how big should i make it

    my impression is that i should make a third primary partition for /home, then 4 logicals (1 swap, 1 /boot, and then 2 /, one for each OS)

    Is this correct? In addition, what should the breakdown be for partition size?

    I am considering the following for the partition breakdown:

    100GB Windows Primary NTFS
    250GB Storage Primary NTFS
    52GB /home Primary ext3 (or ext4)
    3GB swap Logical swap
    30GB / for Ubuntu Logical ext3 (or ext4)
    30GB / for Arch Logical ext3 (or ext4)
    100MB /boot Logical boot

    This comes out to the 465GB that the "500GB" drive actually is.

    Is this right if I were to triple boot, also, what should be the install order between Arch and Ubuntu?
     
    ktang, Sep 22, 2009
    #1
  2. puter1

    puter1 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    95
    Messages:
    776
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You don't want to share your home directory. Too much can go wrong. Also, Arch and Ubuntu are different enough that you wouldn't want to do it.

    Also, why does every poster want to use Ubuntu (aka Crapbuntu) as their main distro?

    I find that there are many critics who bring up a lot of good points. I find that a friggin' Thinkpad can use any distro and any developmental/beta/Alpha distro EXCEPT Ubuntu (9.10). To me, that is amazing. People say Ubuntu is different than Windoze but I perceive it differently. It is almost as if Ubuntu is trying to take things over. They are ALWAYS doing things differently and interfering everywhere in the Linux world. I have heard enough critics bash it and I always used to defend it but I find it difficult to do now.
     
    puter1, Sep 22, 2009
    #2
  3. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    I would not share a /home as would be messy and lead to conflicts in common config files.
     
    theZoid, Sep 22, 2009
    #3
  4. ktang

    ktang Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    puter1, can you give suggestions to an alternative instead of ubuntu? i've used ubuntu before and found it fairly easy to set up and use, so i decided to stay with it after i got a bigger hard drive. should i just share a swap drive between the two distros then?
     
    ktang, Sep 22, 2009
    #4
  5. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Stick with Ubuntu if you know it. There's no better supported distribution. However, go to distrowatch.com and see if something else floats your boat. They all have pro's and con's.
     
    theZoid, Sep 22, 2009
    #5
  6. FarmersDaughter

    FarmersDaughter Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I liked Ubuntu too but my lappy didn't so I chose Crunchbang Linux. It's based on Ubuntu but with Openbox and other changes. I love it. Since you are using Arch, it could work for you, as crunchbang is a step up from ubuntu.
     
    FarmersDaughter, Sep 23, 2009
    #6
  7. ktang

    ktang Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    what suggestions would you have for install order between arch and ubuntu/crunchbang? should I install arch first then ubuntu and use ubuntu's grub as boot manager, or other way around and arch linux's grub as moot manager?

    In other words, which grub has an easier time recognizing that i will have 2 existing OSes installed?
     
    ktang, Sep 23, 2009
    #7
  8. puter1

    puter1 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    95
    Messages:
    776
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    ktang, you can try Live CDs and DVDs to see how they are on your laptop.

    I think I might install Debian on mine after I upgrade my laptop (drive and RAM).

    Is Arch using Grub 2 yet? I have no idea about Arch as I don't use it but hear good things about it.

    It looks like you'll have a lot of partitions. I would plan it out before installing.
     
    puter1, Sep 24, 2009
    #8
  9. ktang

    ktang Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i know how arch and ubuntu are, which is why i want to install them onto my hard drive.

    my question is which should i install first, ubuntu or arch?

    does anyone have suggestions?
     
    ktang, Sep 24, 2009
    #9
  10. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Ubuntu is very good at recognizing other OS's, I would install Ubuntu LAST and Windows FIRST
     
    theZoid, Sep 24, 2009
    #10
  11. ktang

    ktang Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i have already installed windows, so that's taken care of.

    would you suggest installing arch and then ubuntu, but on separate partitions and sharing nothing in common, not even swap?
     
    ktang, Sep 25, 2009
    #11
  12. timberwolf

    timberwolf Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    131
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You can share swap but NOT if you want to suspend/hibernate to disk.

    What is your strategy for the boot loader(s)?
     
    timberwolf, Sep 26, 2009
    #12
  13. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Yes...I wouldn't share anything. Install Ubuntu LAST
     
    theZoid, Sep 26, 2009
    #13