The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Dual boot Arch + Windows one shared space

    Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by zephyrus17, May 6, 2009.

  1. zephyrus17

    zephyrus17 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    646
    Messages:
    1,576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I have this in the Arch linux forum as well, but thought I put it here to get more ideas :)



    My ordered 500Gb HD is coming tomorrow morning, so I thought I'd plan a good strategy for my filesystems. I'm currently running Arch + XP but made the serious mistake of making /home ext4, which means I can't use ext2fs or similar programs to access /home from XP. That means everytime I need to access data in Linux I have to reboot from XP. Urgh.

    I was flirting on the idea of putting NTFS for C: for Windows, ext4 for "/" and NTFS for "/home", for /home to be a shared drive. Is this wise? I know NTFS is pretty looked down upon in the Linux world, but I wanted to run my Windows games from that shared folder as well as my documents and stuff. I've tried using ext2fs to access an ext3 /home from XP, but some games just wouldn't install properly. I've seen the psychocats guide for dual booting, but that's not really what I'm looking for.


    I'm also thinking of having /boot as ext2. Does this have a significant impact on boot speeds? Or does it just save the space from journalling? What size for /boot would you suggest? Should I do stuff like /var, etc?



    So I'll give:
    ??Mb for /boot
    10Gb for /
    2Gb for /swap
    rest for /home
    10Gb for C: (Is that too little?)

    Are there any other wise suggestions? I want to try to streamline the whole thing as much as possible.
     
  2. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    I've read someone it's NOT a good idea to use /home as ntfs....can't think of now...gotta run....someone else will remember though :) I understand your logic because I've been at that crossroad myself :)
     
  3. pixelot

    pixelot Notebook Acolyte

    Reputations:
    3,732
    Messages:
    6,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I dunno about Arch, but if you try to use NTFS as /home in Ubuntu, you'll get an error that it's not a valid Unix filesystem or something to that effect. ;)