The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Lg T1

    Discussion in 'LG' started by alfredo2001, Jan 31, 2007.

  1. alfredo2001

    alfredo2001 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I am about to purchase a LG T1. I noticed that there are two versions, one is with core duo L2400 running at 1.5Ghz and the other one is T2400 running at 1.83Ghz. The Low voltage version L2400 running at a lower frequency is actually alot more expensive than the T2400 verion. The question is WHY?

    How is battery life on both machines? Is Low voltage cpu better? How is performance? Does a low voltage core duo perform EQUALLY WELL as a regular core duo at the same frequency. If so, why did Intel not make ALL their core duos low voltage?

    How about playing AGE OF EMPIRES 3 ON THE T1?

    How about running photoshop on this machine?
     
    alfredo2001, Jan 31, 2007
    #1
  2. someone777

    someone777 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    well i believe low voltage consumes less energy whiich means more battery life
    and if you want to play aoe3 and work on photo than get the t1 with t2400
    well this is my opinion ask somewone else too
     
    someone777, Feb 2, 2007
    #2