I don't get it.
On my Lenovo fresh W520
I get slightly better results with the default Win7 AHCI driver (didn't change anything since installation).
When I install the Intel Rapid Technology driver and console the results aren't any better and even a marginly worse.
So should I just uninstall the Intel driver?
Or maybe the benchmarks aren't telling the truth and thre are other benefits for which I should still keep the intel Rapid Technology driver ?
-
Attached Files:
-
-
Thors.Hammer Notebook Enthusiast
Intel RST offers no benefit that I am aware of for non-RAID systems.
-
Really no benefit for non raid ? I did'n know that.
So I guess I should probably go back to the default drivers. -
On my laptop (not a W520), I get slightly better 4k threaded/queued writes with the Intel RST drivers.
What power profile did you do testing on? -
Anyway I ran the SSD Benchmark again and now the Intel RST driver gave a slightly better result.
I figure anyway these extremely slight variations in performance aren't noticeable, so I am not sure it's worth it to the RST drivers. Maybe there's some kind of overhead with these drivers over the default drivers, don't know. -
Thors.Hammer Notebook Enthusiast
I just read in the past week that the latest Intel RST drivers fixed an issue with hot swapping drives connected via eSATA. That might be a decent reason to use them if this is occurring with an external enclosure.
Intel 510 SSD on W520 - Default WIN Driver performs better than Intel Rapid Technology !!
Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by ComputerMinder, Aug 21, 2011.