The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    How accurate is Super Pi?

    Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by colm, Jun 7, 2007.

  1. colm

    colm Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    21
    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I was interested in benchmarking the T61 (T7300) results from http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=3708&review=ThinkPad+T61 against some of my work machines (8 x Xeon 2.66MHz and 4Gb RAM).
    I noticed that Super Pi doesn't seem to deal with multiple processors very well. It used Proc 0 & proc 7 mainly,. I would have expected it to spread itself evenly across all 8 processors.

    Anyway - the T61 took 59s to calculate 2 million decimal places. My machine was 48s for 2M decimal places.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Grentz

    Grentz Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I believe it is only dual core optimized (thus is good for Core Duo, Core 2 Duo, Single Core, etc.) and not meant for more than that (thus the poor performance on a 8 core system).

    It seems pretty accurate for Dual and Single cores though, I always get the same score if I leave my machine set at the same settings. It also is a good comparison of CPU performance (not overall system performance though).

    My Core 2 Duo Desktop (e6600) OCed to 2.8ghz does 2M in 40 seconds everytime.
     
  3. moon angel

    moon angel Notebook Virtuoso NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    2,011
    Messages:
    2,777
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    56