The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    graphics

    Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by jackie2000, Sep 17, 2011.

  1. jackie2000

    jackie2000 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I didn't upgrade the graphics card in my T520 because I don't do alot of graphic intensive stuff. But I forgot my husband was wanting to play with google earth. I wasn't real impressed with the result (though I've never used it before and may just be expecting too much). Would a better graphics card make much difference? If so how difficult is that to do after the fact? I did download DirectX9.
     
  2. lead_org

    lead_org Purveyor of Truth

    Reputations:
    1,571
    Messages:
    8,107
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    231
    windows xp?

    The Intel HD3000 isn't that bad when it comes to Google Earth, as it is rated for entry CAD work, so it can handle some GPU acceleration.
     
  3. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,842
    Likes Received:
    2,172
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I have no issues with Google Earth's graphics performance using the Intel GPU (and several previous generations of it) but I do notice that GE is one way to give the fan some exercise.

    Google Earth also needs a fast internet connection to download the imagery (although it will cache data if an area has already been visited).

    John