The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Does the Intel® Turbo Memory hard drive cache: 1GB really makes a difference?

    Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by elioncho, Mar 22, 2008.

  1. elioncho

    elioncho Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Does the Intel® Turbo Memory hard drive cache: 1GB really makes a difference?

    By the way, why do LENODO doesnt offers a XVGA+ screen with camera on the T61 model?

    Thanks,
     
  2. webdtc

    webdtc Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    52
    Messages:
    751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    It only works with Vista and I've found that the Turbo Memory might make your machine start up faster, but have not found it to do much more if you have enough memory.

    If for some reason you end up running Vista with 1gb RAM then Turbo Memory helps a little, but not enough to make the experience pleasant.

    Actually, Turbo Memory's 1GB is halved between Turbo Memory(512MB) and Ready Boost (512MB). I think that's a big decision mistake because Vista only allows one Ready Boost device. So, if you get Turbo Memory you are limited to 512MB Ready Boost cache...

    You can disable the Ready Boost portion of Turbo Memory and use your own device for Ready Boost, but that means you are not using half of the Turbo Memory, not a very good investment in my opinion. I wish they just allocated the entire 1gb to Turbo Memory and not included Ready Boost cache.

    I hear there is a Turbo Memory 2, but I would pass on the current Turbo Memory implementation based on personal experience.
     
  3. Les

    Les Not associated with NotebookReview in any way

    Reputations:
    4,706
    Messages:
    5,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It makes absolutely no difference on systems with more than 1Gb memory but the difference is noticeable on 1Gb and below...

    You can search out tons of threads where this has been tested on this site.
     
  4. LoneWolf15

    LoneWolf15 The Chairman

    Reputations:
    976
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I agree with Les. If you have enough RAM, the OS holds enough data in RAM that ReadyBoost/TurboMemory isn't very useful. It only helps when there is so little RAM that TurboMemory is necessary to avoid a lot of paging in and out with the hard disk drive.

    Coupled with the fact that TurboMemory doesn't work if you decide to roll back to Windows XP for any reason, and must be disabled to avoid problems, and it's a lot better choice to make sure you have all the RAM the OS can possibly use, than to have TurboMemory.
     
  5. Renee

    Renee Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    610
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    After making performance measurements, HP decided not to offer it because it makes the most marginal of differences.
     
  6. elioncho

    elioncho Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Thank you very much for your input.
     
  7. philfna

    philfna Notebook Evangelist NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    160
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yes marginal at best would be the general agreement. Intel needs to add more memory to it to make it more useful, or redesign the caching process.