520M --- 640LM --- 520UM --- P8600 --- Atom N280
mhz
2,4-2,9 / 2,1-2,9 / 1,1-1,9 / 2,4 / 1,66
TDP
35w - 25w - 18w - 25w - 2w
superpi 1m
17s - 15s - 28s - 20s - 88s
2m
38s - 37s - 65s - 50s - 194s
32m
901s - 886s - 1489s - 1160s - 4302s
3dmark06 CPU
2727 - 2582 - 1298 - 2135 - 502
Drystone
34553 - xxxxx - xxxxx - 22444 - 4155
Whetstone
28514 - xxxxx - xxxxx - 16370 - 3458
Cinebench single
3024 - 2980 - 1700 - 2588 - 564
multi
6645 - 6043 - 3077 - 4857 - 868
wPrime32
27s - 21s - 38s - 33s - 115
wPrime1024
830s - 667s - 1224s - 1099s - 3634s
Notebookcheck: Mobile Processors - Benchmarklist
I find it interesting that the 640lm is about as fast as the 520m but its only 25watt including the GPU where the older p8600 is 25w+the GPU
The 640lm looks like a winner to me.
-
-
Going up to 540m or 620m from 520m gives you such a small performance boost its not even worth considering, we all knew that, but now you can have the same performance with the 10w less 640lm.
The UM models use roughly twice the power of an atom (when you calculate in the GPU and the rest of things drawing current), but delivers much more than 2x the atom performance.
I would like to see a 1,2kg x301 with UM CPU. Or even 640LM, that would be a really nice laptop IMO.
520m vs 640lm vs 520um and p8600 (c2d)
Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by krate ranus, Aug 18, 2010.