The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    1.66 GHz core duo vs. Pentium 4 2.0 GHz

    Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by nickr, May 29, 2006.

  1. nickr

    nickr Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I currently use a 2.0 GHz Pentium 4 desktop computer. I need to pick up a laptop and am confused about what kinda processor I should get.

    Uses for the laptop will be surfing the web and playing web based videos, music, MS office document creation for work (Word, Excel, Powerpoint), and general emailing and internet communication (chatrooms).

    Anybody know what laptop processor is comparable to a 2.0 GHz Pentium 4? Would a 1.66 GHz core duo be faster or slower? What about a Pentium M?

    What do you recommend?
     
  2. Unreal

    Unreal Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    50
    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    A 1.66Ghz core duo would be MUCH faster in everything then a 2.0Ghz P 4. l'm not too sure about it being faster then the 2.0Ghz Pentium M though.
     
  3. Bog

    Bog Losing it...

    Reputations:
    4,018
    Messages:
    6,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Any of the Pentium M series would thrash the processor you described. Maybe even an Ultra Low Voltage one. A core duo would just humiliate it.
     
  4. nickr

    nickr Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    sweet. thx guys. I wasn't sure if the 1.66 being lower than the 2.0 meant the 2.0 GHz Pent 4 would be faster. I can't afford the 2.0 GHz duo core (which I thought was comparable to the 2.0 GHz Pent 4) so I thought I'd be getting a slower computer with the 1.66.

    thanks again.
     
  5. masteraleph

    masteraleph Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    7
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The original P-M 1.6 was roughly equivalent to the P4 2.4B (the P4 2.4A, which is the successor to the P42.4, is slightly slower than the 2.4B). The second core under the "P-M" monikker was slightly faster. The 1.66 Core Duo is roughly comparable to a 3Ghz P4 or faster.
     
  6. Metamorphical

    Metamorphical Good computer user

    Reputations:
    2,618
    Messages:
    2,194
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Between you and me. I have an old super pi time for a 2.4ghz P4m and my 1.6Pm smokes it. I'm willing the bet a Core Duo would be phenominally faster.
     
  7. dmc

    dmc Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    its too bad they dont keep numbers consistant
     
  8. MD1032

    MD1032 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    The numbers are consistent; they reflect the clock speed. The newer processors, however, are WAY more efficient and thus can process much faster, even on a slower clock speed.
     
  9. ZaZ

    ZaZ Super Model Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    4,982
    Messages:
    34,001
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    581
    You can't judge performance by the clocky anymore.
     
  10. Karl Gruber

    Karl Gruber Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I can judge performance by snapping my fingers. Get the Core Duo 1.83mhz T60