The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    downloading at the same time uploading

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by kenny1999, Feb 14, 2017.

  1. kenny1999

    kenny1999 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    26
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    41
    I don't know how SSD or spinning hard drive works, but would it cause more wear to the drives if downloading and uploading at the same time?



    or is it better for the hardware to only either upload (reading) or download (writing) but not doing both at the same time?
     
  2. downloads

    downloads No, Dee Dee, no! Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,729
    Messages:
    8,722
    Likes Received:
    2,230
    Trophy Points:
    331
    It doesn't matter.
     
  3. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,548
    Messages:
    9,585
    Likes Received:
    4,997
    Trophy Points:
    431
    On an HDD this could cause an ever so slight usage increase in seeks but that is about it.
     
  4. Beemo

    Beemo BGA is totally TSK TSK!

    Reputations:
    315
    Messages:
    1,218
    Likes Received:
    794
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Packet is killing each other therefore there is a slight chance of data corruption.
     
  5. Jarhead

    Jarhead 恋の♡アカサタナ

    Reputations:
    5,036
    Messages:
    12,168
    Likes Received:
    3,133
    Trophy Points:
    681
    That's an interesting claim, though it's also not a true claim. Your drive I/O is placed in a queue and the operations are performed when the drive is able to do so. A more detailed explanation (for HDDs, but the principle is the same with SSDs; just replace platters with NAND chips): http://superuser.com/questions/3658...-write-simultaneously-on-different-tracks-how
     
    tilleroftheearth likes this.
  6. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    For a given workload volume, the 'wear' would be the same.

    What will be different is the performance. HDD's and SSD's are not able to read and write at the same time (they are half duplex designs) - therefore the performance will suffer.

    How much depends on the workload/workflow and the specific controller and nand combination in question. 3D TLC nand? Watch the electrons flow in slow motion...

    With a HDD... the faster the platter speed and the less dense the platters are (at any given tech year/level...) - the faster it will be (or in other words; the less the performance will suffer...).

    With both SSD's and HDD's:
    • the less full they are the faster they will be with all storage related performance.
    • allowing the operating system to use less than the full capacity speeds up performance too.
      • with an HDD - it's called short stroking and using the first 10% of the drive will give the fastest and most consistent performance.
      • with an SSD - it's called OP'ing and what it effectively does is put the focus of the controller on the user - rather than the self preservation of the nand chips (usually; right when the user needs the performance most...).

    'Wear' will depend on total work done/completed and not necessarily the order of that work/load.

    What will vary greatly will be the performance, as stated above.

     
    Papusan likes this.