The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    difference in speed from 250g/320g 5400 rpm hdd's

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by pukemon, Jun 14, 2008.

  1. pukemon

    pukemon are you unplugged?

    Reputations:
    461
    Messages:
    2,551
    Likes Received:
    245
    Trophy Points:
    81
    i've been searching the forums for performance comparisons but can't find what i'm looking for. i want to upgrade my hdd from 160 gigs to @ least 250gigs. will there be a noticeable difference or should i get a 320gig?
     
    pukemon, Jun 14, 2008
    #1
  2. flipfire

    flipfire Moderately Boss

    Reputations:
    6,156
    Messages:
    11,214
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    466
    have you checked HDtune benchmarks thread?
     
    flipfire, Jun 14, 2008
    #2
  3. K-TRON

    K-TRON Hi, I'm Jimmy Diesel ^_^

    Reputations:
    4,412
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    205
    pukemon, here is what you want to know:
    Most 160gb 5400rpm drives are able to maintain 35mb/sec of data bandwidth. The samsung drive with one 160gb platter will be able to maintain speeds of 53mb/sec.
    The 250gb drives are able to maintain 44mb/sec,
    and all 320gb 5400 drives can maintain 52mb/sec or so

    K-TRON
     
    K-TRON, Jun 14, 2008
    #3
  4. pukemon

    pukemon are you unplugged?

    Reputations:
    461
    Messages:
    2,551
    Likes Received:
    245
    Trophy Points:
    81
    thanks. so question now is i already bought a 250g WD drive. should i return it and get a 320g? i'm looking more for performance. i don't necessarily need all the space, but i definitely want the headroom because i'll be dual booting, possibly triple booting. the price difference is $40 to go 320g but i will probably wait for a sale on the 320g. what do you think?
     
    pukemon, Jun 14, 2008
    #4
  5. flipfire

    flipfire Moderately Boss

    Reputations:
    6,156
    Messages:
    11,214
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    466
    k-tron already gave you the figures, you will have to choose for yourself.

    personally id go with the 320gb
     
    flipfire, Jun 14, 2008
    #5
  6. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Check the benchmarks on http://www.storagereview.com/Hitachi250WD320.sr?page=0,2
    Look for the benchmarks that is important to you. HD Tune is synthetic benchmark and the results don't say much about real life performance.

    320GB sometimes take more power but look at the results for yourself.
     
    Phil, Jun 14, 2008
    #6
  7. eleron911

    eleron911 HighSpeedFreak

    Reputations:
    3,886
    Messages:
    11,104
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    The 320 5k can be had for ~120$ , so I`d get that if I were you, it's just as fast as 200gb 7k one, but you already know that from the S/C forum. :p
     
    eleron911, Jun 14, 2008
    #7
  8. RaderCad

    RaderCad Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    9
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    :eek: You might want to look into the HEAT issues.

    The 320GB drives I looked into all had a higher heat of operation than the 250GB drives.

    ;)
     
    RaderCad, Jun 14, 2008
    #8
  9. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Phil, Jun 15, 2008
    #9
  10. mobytoby

    mobytoby Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    76
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    What 160GB samsung drive is that you mean?
     
    mobytoby, Jun 15, 2008
    #10
  11. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    HM160HI (SATA) or HM160HC (PATA).

    John
     
    John Ratsey, Jun 15, 2008
    #11
  12. eleron911

    eleron911 HighSpeedFreak

    Reputations:
    3,886
    Messages:
    11,104
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    I know dude, but a 320/7200 will also release a lot more heat.
    And the price is almost double that of the 320/5400. SO it's totally messed up.
     
    eleron911, Jun 15, 2008
    #12
  13. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    I was talking about a 200GB/7200 rpm. Where did you find that it produces too much heat? I personally never had a problem with 7200rpm disks.

    It is more expensive, but some people value performance more than others. It seemed to me that the OP was looking for performance.
     
    Phil, Jun 15, 2008
    #13
  14. pukemon

    pukemon are you unplugged?

    Reputations:
    461
    Messages:
    2,551
    Likes Received:
    245
    Trophy Points:
    81
    i'm weighing performance/value 5400 rpm and western digital only. i do not want to worry about heat issues at all even though i have overkill with cooling. i'm sure some other brand can offer ~5 megs a second better performance 5k or 7k but none will offer the silence and coolness of a western digital.
     
    pukemon, Jun 15, 2008
    #14