The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    WD Scorpio problems

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by [toPh], Aug 18, 2008.

  1. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I recently bought a new Western Digital Scorpion Blue 250GB hard drive for my HP nc4010 notebook.

    I installed the the drive and also a fresh install of XP Home. I then installed my applications and transferred over my photos

    When transferring things over I realsied how slow it was going. It was also taking longer than usual to boot windows.

    I ran HD Tune and it showed results of around 2mb/sec

    I posted these results in the HD Tune thread and was told it could be background processes running.

    I then ran it plugged into my PC and the results were 60mb/sec. Which is more what I was expecting.

    I then ran a fresh install of XP home on my laptop on the HDD and the first thing I did was run HD Tune.

    [​IMG]

    This shows the processes running whilst doing the test and CPU usage.

    [​IMG]

    What else could be causing the problem? Could the drive just be incompatabile with my laptop?
     
  2. jisaac

    jisaac Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    306
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    it was unlikely to be background processes anyway considering there weren't (relatively) many spikes on the hdtune graph. the drive is not incompatible. the drive is either, damaged, or incorrectly installed. of course it could be a problem with some other hardware in your system or even a virus (even though you've just reinstalled). I suggest downloading hiren's cd, and run some of the diagnostic tests.:
    http://www.hiren.info/pages/bootcd
     
  3. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    It may be in wrong DMA/UDMA mode. You could check your options in the bios and post a screenshot of the info page of HDTune.
     
  4. Dook

    Dook Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    318
    Messages:
    2,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You did install your mobo/chipset drivers,correct?
     
  5. jisaac

    jisaac Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    306
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    unlikely to be wrong udma mode considering, the lowest is udma 0 which has a max transfer rate of 16.7mb/s. It would have to be in pio mode 0, which peaks at 3.3mb/s... even so i think its unlikely to be the cause of the problem
     
  6. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    That's definitely PIO mode. Look at the very high CPU utilisation (PIO uses the CPU, DMA (Direct Memory Access) bypasses the CPU).

    Was it an early version of XP Home? It won't have got the right chipset driver and has then gone into compatibility mode.

    First update the chipset driver to the latest from the manufactueer's website. Then uninstall the IDE channels under the IDE ATA/ATPI controllers and reboot. Windows will then redetect the hardware and should go into UDMA 5.

    It would also be prudent to install SP3 for XP which will update and patch a lot of things.

    John
     
  7. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    That's what I meant with in the wrong mode. PIO.
     
  8. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    This is something I have just suddenly realised I may have overlooked.

    Can someone confirm this is the correct driver that I need here

    As it doesn't seem to be installing for some reason :confused: :mad:
     
  9. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
  10. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I did yes, and it's still not working.

    Could it possible be that it doesn't like XP home, as I've always had XP Pro installed before with no problems.

    Release notes don't mention XP Home on the Intel website and it is a business laptop. But could that stop it installing the drivers?
     
  11. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    WD Data Lifeguard Tools results

    [​IMG]
     
  12. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    1. What options do you have for the current transfer rate on the first IDE channel of the IDE ATA/ATAPI controller. Will it let you set it to UDMA Mode 5 (will require a reboot)?

    2. If (1) doesn't work, uninstall the IDE channel and reboot (it might be necessary to uninstall the whole controller).

    If the above don't work then the best approach is to use nLite to create a new XP boot disk which includes both SP3 and all the drivers. I think there's an nLite guide somewhere, but it's very easy. Once you have a new boot disk then redo the installation.

    John
     
  13. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    How do I set this?
     
  14. jisaac

    jisaac Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    306
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
  15. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    These are the settings

    [​IMG]
     
  16. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    This is where I'm getting puzzled. Device Manager is showing an Ali M5229 IDE controller. And the specs here say it is ATI 350M.

    Did you try uninstalling the controller and let Windows reboot and redetect the hardware. It should then match it with the driver that's been installed on the computer using the INF update.

    On the IDE channel, the DMA if available is the best you can do. However, something isn't right so it's not going into that mode.

    BTW, what version XP was on that disk? Original, SP1, SP2 or SP2a?

    John
     
  17. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    XP Home 2002 SP3

    Just uninstalled the ALi IDE controller and let it re0install on it's pwn after a reboot and it installed the same thing again. Could this be afecting it?
     
  18. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I've just Googled for "ALI M5229" and found this.

    It could be very relevant. Give it a try.

    John
     
  19. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Brilliant!!!
    Thank you very much.
    Installed the ALi UltraIDE driver and all seems much better.
    I'll run another HD Tune and see exactly what results and post them up.

    Thanks again. :D
     
  20. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    :) :)
    But we couldn't have figured it out before seeing the IDE controller. HP's product spec wasn't very helpful.

    Have you also got rid of all those other exclamation marks in Device Manager?

    John
     
  21. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    There is still one for the PCI modem and another unknown device.

    Not sure what that is and I don't use the modem.
     
  22. D3X

    D3X the robo know it all

    Reputations:
    688
    Messages:
    1,666
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Probably is the modem then, did you install the driver for it? Not important though if you don't use it, and it's probably better not installing the driver has it would not use any resources.
     
  23. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Still getting strange resuluts from HD Tune

    [​IMG]

    Just after 50% of the test it drops right down
    :confused:
     
  24. D3X

    D3X the robo know it all

    Reputations:
    688
    Messages:
    1,666
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Your CPU usage is high, that's your problem, quit from majority of your applications and run the benchmark again. Use Task Manager and kill any processes that take up CPU load, any CPU load will directly affect your HD benchmark.

    That said, it looks like John solved your problem.
     
  25. Ayle

    Ayle Trailblazer

    Reputations:
    877
    Messages:
    3,707
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    106
    So basically something is causing it to fallback to PIO..... Maybe the drive has a faulty controller... Do you have a usb enclosure where you could test it?
     
  26. D3X

    D3X the robo know it all

    Reputations:
    688
    Messages:
    1,666
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    It was a fresh Windows XP install, so it lacked the proper chipset drivers, so the system was running in compatibility mode (PIO).
     
  27. [toPh]

    [toPh] Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Could it be to do with the 137GB recognition thing.
    As the drive is 250GB and the first 55% is fine. Then it drops immediately?

    Just a thought.
     
  28. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Going back to the link I found, it looks likely that the BIOS doesn't see properly beyond the 137GB limit. What does the BIOS report as the HDD capacity.

    See the WD website for suggestions.

    John
     
  29. Ayle

    Ayle Trailblazer

    Reputations:
    877
    Messages:
    3,707
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    106
    I'm talking about the last hdtune screenshot: it works well then it suddenly drops back to PIO speeds which means that it mysteriously falled back to compatibility mode...
     
  30. D3X

    D3X the robo know it all

    Reputations:
    688
    Messages:
    1,666
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Actually on second thought that graph is a little too level after 55%, and it sits right at the same PIO mode transfer speed.

    It looks as though this is a chipset/controller limitation. The UltraIDE driver looks already a couple years old and lacks support. I don't know if you can ever get it fully working.
     
  31. D3X

    D3X the robo know it all

    Reputations:
    688
    Messages:
    1,666
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
  32. Alex

    Alex Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    4,081
    Messages:
    4,293
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Just a thought,

    Would partitioning the drive into 2 partitions less than 137 GB each solve the problems?


    Alex
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015
  33. D3X

    D3X the robo know it all

    Reputations:
    688
    Messages:
    1,666
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Unfortunately no. This has nothing to do with partition tables, but the overall capacity supported by the chipset. It identifies 137GB and operates that under UDMA, but beyond that would be in PIO mode.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015