The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Seagate bought LSI...

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Marecki_clf, May 30, 2014.

  1. Marecki_clf

    Marecki_clf Homo laptopicus

    Reputations:
    464
    Messages:
    1,507
    Likes Received:
    170
    Trophy Points:
    81
  2. Marksman30k

    Marksman30k Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    2,080
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    81
    8 years ago, Seagate could've killed the fledgling SSD industry to preserve their HDD business with this maneuver. But now, Samsung and Intel won't let that happen. Its good because I'm interested to see what LSI can achieve with Seagate's engineering and manufacturing resources.
     
  3. Marecki_clf

    Marecki_clf Homo laptopicus

    Reputations:
    464
    Messages:
    1,507
    Likes Received:
    170
    Trophy Points:
    81
    I think that it's not intended by Seagate to be a move to kill the SSD industry. It's more of a "big fish swallowing a smaller fish in a desperate fight for survival" kind of move. I am curious, what will Seagate be able to accomplish on the storage media market with this acquisition.
     
  4. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    Sandforce+Seagate = a perfect marriage of two scary storage subsystem partners.

    (And one I won't get in the middle of... probably ever).


    Yeah; not even LSI could make SF a real controller (even though Intel has... though their (Intel's) goal has always been the right one though: usable performance, not just high 'scores'. Of course, I and many others paid handsomely for that privilege, which I thank Intel for giving me the opportunity to do).