The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Samsung 950 PRO vs SM951

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Spartan@HIDevolution, Oct 28, 2015.

  1. Spartan@HIDevolution

    Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative

    Reputations:
    39,584
    Messages:
    23,560
    Likes Received:
    36,855
    Trophy Points:
    931
    @Cloudfire @tilleroftheearth @octiceps

    I ordered a new lappy and I chose two Samsung 950 PRO M2 NVME 512GB SSDs in RAID 0

    The other option they had was the Samsung SM951 NVME M2 SSD but I choose the Samsung 950 PRO as its newer and from the specs on the whitepaper seems a tad faster. Did I make the right choice choosing it over the SM951?

    I just saw the review, it's a mixed bag of results I don't know what to make of this.

    Please also check the performance consistency it doesn't make any sense, the SM951 256GB blows everything else out of the water by a large fraction whilst even the SM951 512GB is nowhere near as close:

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/9702/samsung-950-pro-ssd-review-256gb-512gb/6
     
  2. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    See:
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...erforming-as-advertised.783057/#post-10119847

    See:
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...erforming-as-advertised.783057/#post-10120015

    See:
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...ing-as-advertised.783057/page-2#post-10122189

    See:
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...ing-as-advertised.783057/page-2#post-10122448


    Did you make the right choice over the OEM SM951 - probably.

    But what I make of this steaming pile of ss is that M.2 is not all it's cracked up to be, by a long shot.

    I don't give a minutes thought of what might be. I care about what is. NVMe isn't (yet; at least for a notebook platform).
     
    Spartan@HIDevolution likes this.
  3. PushT

    PushT Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    22
    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    41
    I would say M.2 is not all it's cracked up to be - but m.2 nvme IS( read : pcie x4 lanes) . Latency and command queuing are two areas where a lot of people really needed better drives, and nvme delivers. With the reduced complexity and more streamlined storage stack latency is greatly reduced over ahci + don't forget that support for multiple command queues "ensures that the CPU can be used to its full potential and that the IOPS is not bottlenecked by single core limitation." , to quote Anandtech.
    Now what I find people REALLY are discussing is often real world scenarios of mixed read/write workloads, especially working with small files. In that department there is room for improvement. You could push that argument all the way to steady state perfomance, but then you already have the option of buying yourself a super expensive sata or pcie enterprise drive don't you ? Or a less expensive sata enterprise one ? Good NAND is not cheap. You really can't expect the stars would be my sentiment. You already got the moon with these drives.
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2015