The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    SSDs and the future of SATA 3

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by HopelesslyFaithful, Feb 4, 2014.

  1. HopelesslyFaithful

    HopelesslyFaithful Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,552
    Messages:
    3,271
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So from what i have figured out is there will be no future SATA 4 so what is the future of faster SATA 3 drives? I have an sammy 840 but i was hopping that down the road a faster one would exist. I am not concerned about sequential because any gain in that is not really that tangible. I am more concerned about 4K and 512k reads/writes. You can throw in a SATA3 drive that is leagues faster than a SATA 2 drive of the day and see tangible differences mostly due to 4k and 512k speeds. Do you think any significantly faster SATA 3 drives will come out or are we kinda just boned with a dead end?
     
  2. notbook

    notbook Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    The next step up from SATA 3 is PCI Express. If each PCIe lane can transfer 1 GB/s (or 500 MB/s) and there are multiple lanes, that's a huge improvement over SATA 3. As far as notebooks are concerned, an M.2 slot -- one that is connected to PCIe lanes -- is required to use PCIe SSDs. Right now there are only a few notebooks with this feature. I actually created a thread about it not too long ago (see here). The number of M.2 PCIe SSDs available is also small.

    That's only half the story, though. The other thing is the transition from AHCI to NVM Express. It promises lower latencies and exploits parallelism among other things. You can imagine 4 kB (and other small sizes) read and write performance increasing considerably.
     
  3. Jarhead

    Jarhead 恋の♡アカサタナ

    Reputations:
    5,036
    Messages:
    12,168
    Likes Received:
    3,133
    Trophy Points:
    681
    What's the future of SATA III drives? Keep using them until they die, I suppose.

    SATA's far from being dead in the desktop, and in the laptop I don't see it going away anytime soon. But yeah, future standards like M.2 will probably replace SATA whenever the price/GB of SSDs comes close enough to the price/GB of mechanical hard drives.
     
  4. Jobine

    Jobine Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    934
    Messages:
    6,582
    Likes Received:
    677
    Trophy Points:
    281
    The future is M.2 PCIe SSD's with NVMe controllers, but all current M.2 drives use SATA controllers.
     
  5. Tsunade_Hime

    Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow

    Reputations:
    5,413
    Messages:
    10,711
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Trophy Points:
    581
    The numbers posted are sequential read/write speeds and only should be used under "ideal" conditions, as you stated 4k speeds are more important in normal everyday tasks.

    My old Samsung 840 500 GB SSD in my R2 (single SSD):

    [​IMG]

    My old Intel 320 series 160 GB RAID 0 in my R2:

    [​IMG]

    The RAID 0 array in a everyday sense blew the 500 GB SSD away. Windows booted to a usable desktop under 8 seconds. It ran, extracted, installed Office 2007 in like ~5 seconds. Everything ran much faster.
     
  6. HopelesslyFaithful

    HopelesslyFaithful Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,552
    Messages:
    3,271
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i personally am tempted to run raid 0 but i dont have the time or money at the moment to bother with it.

    your 840 blows for 500GB BTW. As you can see after a little while my writes took a huge hit with use.
    Samsung 840 500GB crystaldiskmark 1 to 4.png