The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    RAM timings and CAS latency

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by who8mahrice, Sep 3, 2006.

  1. who8mahrice

    who8mahrice Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Could someone explain to me what these are and how they are measured >_>? I've read that a lower CAS latency is generall better since it is the time it takes for the RAM to read through one cycle of data...though if the amount of data read per cycle is too low, a low latency is still bad. Can anyone explain on the timing too? 4-4-4-12? 5-5-5-15? What? lol

    Thanks :-D
     
  2. Jalf

    Jalf Comrade Santa

    Reputations:
    2,883
    Messages:
    3,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Google RAM timings if you want an accurate answer.

    But it basically refers to how many RAM clock cycles are needed to perform execute various commands. Some are executed more often than others (For example, selecting a row can be done once, after which, you can typically read through lots of columns on that row), and some can get a "head start", so it doesn't matter that they take longer.

    But yes, basically, lower latencies are better. And the first number is the most important one. (The CAS latency)
     
  3. who8mahrice

    who8mahrice Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Ok..so lower is better. That pretty much sums it up hahah. :p Thanks, I'll google it heh