The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Laptop screen choice

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by crispy1970, Dec 19, 2009.

  1. crispy1970

    crispy1970 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    H Guys,

    Could anybody please help out a novice.

    I have a choice of laptop screens to make, it will be at a scarfice of something thing else, probably a CPU upgrade but I can deal with that.

    I don't really intend to watch many HD films on this laptop but I would like to know what effect the differences between these screens would be for other uses.

    They are the following Sony screens

    16.4" LCD, 1600 x 900 41.7 cm (16.4") WXGA++ (1600 x 900) Widescreen X-black LCD screen with built-in "Motion Eye" Digital Camera

    16.4" HD1080 LCD, 1920x1080 [ + £ 40.0 ]41.7 cm (16.4") H1080 WXGA++920 x 1080) Widescreen X-black LCD with multiple lamp technology and built-in "Motion Eye" Digital Camera


    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Chris
     
  2. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    I would automatically go for the bigger real estate!

    1920x1080 resolution will offer you a bigger peak into an Excel spreadsheet (more rows/columns), a bigger canvas for the actual image in PS vs. mostly toolbars, same with AutoCAD, 3DsMax and many other similar programs. In Word, for example, you can have two full size pages side by side with no scrolling needed and still read them easily (how good are your eyes? ;) ).

    What the spec's hint at is that the 1920 screen will also offer a better and more uniform output (corners/top/bottom will/should be more even/balanced with center of screen) compared to the 1600 screen.

    The higher the resolution of the screen, usually the higher the quality it is.

    With the Screen, the Keyboard and the Mouse/Touchpad being the top 3 ways we interact with our notebooks, I would say this easily qualifies for 'must have' over a slightly faster CPU or GPU anyday, YMMV. Especially if you're considering this system for long-term use.

    Just remember, once used to this massive canvas on which your computing dreams play out, low res screens will look like kids toys that are at 30 point font size that make them look slightly cartoonish - yes, you will get spoiled. :D

    Cheers!
     
  3. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Sony's double lamp screens are far superior (contrast, brightness, colors) to the single lamp screens.

    The single lamp screen is good enough for most users though.
     
  4. wildman_33

    wildman_33 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    35
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i have a single lamp on my sony and whilst its ok and better than the screen on my friends acer, i have an old sony with dual lamp and the colours on the screen look better and you dont notice backlight bleed so much. plus a 1080p screen gives lots of space to work on and get rid of interent scrolling
     
  5. crispy1970

    crispy1970 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    cheers guys , thanks for the comments, the better screen it is then.