The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Intel and their constant processor releases

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Night, Jul 31, 2007.

  1. Night

    Night Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    40
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Hey, I just had a question regarding Intel and their chipset road map.

    It seems every 6-8 months they are releasing a brand new platform, where as in the past, we could go much longer time between releases. Penryn (SR platform) or whatever the hell they call it is probably releasing early 2008. Gen5 platform is comming out Q2 2008 from what I hear, probably Q3 is more likely.

    I bought my first P4 desktop in 2003, and in late 2004 I bought another P4 desktop with the same 3.0 GHz processor. Processor upgrades used to be a huge deal (think PIII to P4), and now it seems that every release has very little to offer in terms of performance boost (the only real difference being 32 bit to 64).

    So basically, I am just wondering if anyone has any idea of why Intel decides its better to release a new chip so frequently without adding much in the way of preformance? The only thing I can thing of is higher profit due to constant new release, but they way they used to do it before was just keep releasing the same platform chips but at higher clocks.

    I liked it better when the changes to the platform were more distinct and
    tangible.

    Thoughts? Maybe I just didn't realize it before and the same thing was happening?
     
  2. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    the core duo was a huge leap beyond the pentium 4. the core 2 duo was a moderate jump, with a reworked architecture that improved performance and brought in 64 bit, like you said.

    but now we are in the core 2 duo age. the core 2 duo has been around a while now. merom, santa rosa, penryn... its all core 2 duo.

    the pentium 4 had codenames for microupgrades too.. northwood, prescott, etc...
     
  3. azntfl

    azntfl Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    27
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    its all about $$$$$$$$$$$
     
  4. TehStranger

    TehStranger Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    33
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Didn't there used to be some Law about processor upgrades every 6 months?
     
  5. Mr._Kubelwagen

    Mr._Kubelwagen More machine now than man

    Reputations:
    398
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You're thinking of Moore's Law. The number of transistors on a circuit is supposedly able to double every 18-24 months.
     
  6. tebore

    tebore Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    55
    Messages:
    521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Processor upgrades are fine.

    What pisses me off is they keep changing the socket. All the Processors since the Dothan are completely compatible electronically but Intel changed the socket so you can't use them in order notebooks. You could technically use a Core 2 Duo in a 915 Chipset but Intel changed the socket.