The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Centrino ULV

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by dyne, Mar 20, 2006.

  1. dyne

    dyne Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Pls,could anybody tell me what frequency of pentium 4,celeron m,amd celeron will give the same performance as 1.1 ghz centrino ulv (m733)???
     
  2. skywalker

    skywalker Business Notebook FTW!!

    Reputations:
    100
    Messages:
    2,126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Just my thought, my friend has vaio with 1.2ghz ulv(400MHz fsb) 512ddr and its performance is snappy compared to my old notebook, toshiba satellite 2430 with p4m 1.6,256ddr 2100.
    I opened photoshop cs2 in both laptops, and 1.2ulv performs a bit faster than my old toshiba.
     
  3. dyne

    dyne Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    but,if to campare ulv with Celeron 2000, pentium 4 1800 (not mobile), and celeon M 1,4 (or 1.3) . How would you arrange them from 1 to 5 place (by performance).

    thx
     
  4. skywalker

    skywalker Business Notebook FTW!!

    Reputations:
    100
    Messages:
    2,126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Hmm..P4 1.8GHz (non mobile)in a laptop is quite fast, whereas celeronM 360(1.4Ghz)slightly better than celeron 2Ghz because of huge L2 cache.
    So in terms of performance,P4 1.8GHz > UlV 1.1/1.2GHz > celeron M 1.4GHz > celeron 2GHz.
    Celeron M(pentium M derivative) is the first celeron made by Intel that performs quite good, any old celerons p4/m based are not good even suffer poor performance
     
  5. Brian

    Brian Working at 486 Speed NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    947
    Messages:
    8,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Depends on the speeds and what you're doing, but the ULV will generally be the slowest, even the 1.1GHz ULV compared to a higher clock speed Celeron. That said, I've been on the ULV for 3 years for my primary machine and have no issues.
     
  6. Rahul

    Rahul Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,741
    Messages:
    6,252
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    216
    They are quite speedy processors and suitable for many tasks except for very intensive ones like gaming, heavy video editing and the like.
    I know my 1.0 ghz Pentium M ULV in my Lifebook P5020D was much faster than the 1.1 ghz AMD Athlon in my old desktop. I used it for basic tasks with 512 megs of ram and it ran them all without a hitch, didn't stutter at all with several windows open as well.
     
  7. dyne

    dyne Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  8. ivar

    ivar Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    432
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The 1,2GHz PM ULV I tested runs 2M superpi test in 2min27sec to 2m30sec (undervolting software and a couple of other small monitoring programs were running in parallel).

    SiSo Sandra 2005 arythmetic benchmark for my system with 1,2GHz PM ULV produces:
    Dhrystone ALU 5116 MIPS
    Whetstone FPU/iSSE21573/2124 MFLOPS

    This puts this processor on par with Pentium 4 2GHz 256L2
    (Dhrystone ALU 5247 MIPS, Whetstone FPU/iSSE2 1460/2691 MFLOPS),
    15% below Athlon XP 1600+ 1.4GHz,
    20% below PM 715 1,4GHz Banias, etc.

    It is more than enough for everyday office work and internet.