The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    2.5'' 1TB 9.5mm Hard Drive for storage and backup purposes?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Gremo, Feb 2, 2013.

  1. Gremo

    Gremo Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    25
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    There are so many 2.5'' 1TB 9.5mm hard drives at this time, and I can't choose what's the best form me. So I'm here asking some help. My requirements, ordered by priority:

    • Quiet
    • 1080p video playback without shuttering
    • Decent speed for backup
    • Low power consumption

    I've found five models so far. The have quite the same features, apart from the WD10JUCT with 16Mb cache and HTS541010A9E680 that's SATA600. Price is for my country (not including shipping costs):

    • $85,17 / €62,38: Toshiba MQ01ABD100
    • $88,91 / €65,12: Samsung HN-M101MBB
    • $79,31 / €58,09: Hitachi HTS541010A9E680
    • $94,30 / €69,07: Western Digital WD10JPVT
    • $104,39 / €76,46: Western Digital WD10JUCT

    Which should I buy, based on my preferences? Thanks, really, for helping me.
     
  2. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    They all meet your requirements IMO.
     
  3. Gremo

    Gremo Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    25
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    So, would you go for the cheaper one? Or for the WD10JUCT for a few extra bucks, given the doubled cache size? Thanks for your help!
     
  4. rahulkadukar

    rahulkadukar Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    If playing movies and decent speed are your only requirement go for the cheapest one but if you are planning to get a HD get the WD10JUCT for the extra cache because buying a HD is something you may do only once every couple of years.
     
  5. Gremo

    Gremo Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    25
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    How the extra cache will affect performance?
     
  6. Marksman30k

    Marksman30k Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    2,080
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    81
    cache generally improves snappiness when you open and close a small subset (about 8-16mb) of files continuously. It also improves the Random Write performance when you really bombard the drive with requests (i.e. high queue depth). For the purposes you outlined, you want a drive with high sequential transfer speed. I can vouch for the WD10JPVT being really good, its transfer speed comes within about 5% of the much faster 7200RPM drives yet is really quiet. I honestly didn't know a 16mb cache version of the WD10JPVT existed (i.e. the WD10JUVT), I guess you can get that too due to low price difference only if the drive also has 2 platters. This is important because drives with more platters tend to be noisier and use more energy.
    I am assuming though you are using this drive for storage (specifically external storage)

    If you want a system drive (for Windows), you really need one of the 7200RPM drives. This is because while their transfer speeds are similar to the high density 5400RPM drives, they are much snappier (i.e. lower access times) for Windows. Try to also get one in the highest capacity possible (750gb WD blacks come to mind) as you can limit your partition to ensure the Windows is only on the fastest outer platter tracks.
     
  7. Prostar Computer

    Prostar Computer Company Representative

    Reputations:
    1,257
    Messages:
    7,426
    Likes Received:
    1,016
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Cache allocation will improve your performance, and the Western Digitals are good drives in terms of longevity and performance. If you really want something that fits the bill for all your requirements, an SSD would satisfy kindly, but would also cost you considerably more.

    Otherwise, I would say go with one of WDs. I hear the Hitachi drives are a little louder, but other than that, they should all produce about the same level of noise (you should be able to find spec sheets that show you the dB rating for the drives, if applicable).