The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Dell Precision M4300 / Performance & audo experiences

    Discussion in 'Dell' started by gaumas, Oct 15, 2007.

  1. gaumas

    gaumas Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hi

    I'm in the nice position, that I can choose my new dell notebook for work myself. I'm a multimedia designer, using the common tool like photoshop, illustrator, flash, premiere or aftereffects. I don't want a super heavy 17" notebook, that's why the M4300 is on my final list.

    Now 2 questions that are important for me (job/personally) - maybe someone can help me:

    a) how is the performance of the m4300 when working on large photoshop files?

    b) how is the audio quality (speaker / headphone / soundcard)

    Thank you!
    Cheers from Switzerland
     
  2. gaumas

    gaumas Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I just found 2 threads about the sound in the dell help forums. It seams that the soundcard and soundquality of the Precision M4300 is pretty bad.
     
  3. ANTDOD

    ANTDOD Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    9
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I can tell you about M6300

    1. Although performance is fantastic, I am returning it due to a bad quality of screens on 1440x900.
    2. In M6300 audio is really nice. Especially on the jack.

    I use it for Photoshop etc.
     
  4. bldhound

    bldhound Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I have a new 4300 and my screen quality is excellent and I use photoshop. The performance is also great. I haven't really tested the sound quality yet as I have only had it almost a week and am still getting set up but I am quite satisfied with my purchase.
     
  5. booyaa

    booyaa Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have a precision M4300. I have the WUXGA res - matte - its awesome.

    This thing is a beast - hauls serious ass and has plenty of space - although I am not running CAD or anything retarded. I am a network engineer and most of my apps are thin.

    The audio is the drawback to this system. But dude - its a ****ing laptop. What do you want? Dolby 5.1?

    The audio is fine for it being a portable. Also - find a decent A2DP stack and do stereo BT, or use the jack....

    This system is a beast. I am gonna rebuild and dual boot vista with gentoo on it....

    by the way - anyone have experience/problems in here getting Linux to recognize some of this hardware?
     
  6. Sir Joe

    Sir Joe Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  7. pitz

    pitz Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    56
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    66
    The D830 and the M4300 are identical except for the video card, and the option of a Truelife WSXGA+ streen.

    If you can save a few bucks...no reason to go with the M4300 unless you want the better video card. But even then, I hear the differences between the N140M and the FX360M are minute.
     
  8. Sir Joe

    Sir Joe Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I agree, for this reason I am asking: I never used a cad nor really know what it is or for what is it for. Nor did 3d, or video/audio editing.
    So, I need the opinion of people who know the them, because I have no idea of what i can do and what i cannot do with a Quadro 135M or 140M or FX360M. Nor I can calculate if for example the 135M is enough to guarantee me a slow "getting old" of the machine and the freedom to do some video edit or simple graphic in 2 years (when standards will be higher, but anyway I could use older programs to fix this).
    Also, I understand that the difference between 140M and 360M are minutes (just open gl capabilities, which I have no idea what is it for), but what about the 135M?
    And, for example, I am not able to calculate if it is a more equilibrate choice for me a 360M or a 140M with the T7500 processor, or a 135M with the T7700. Which one guarantee me more what I need (a notebook I can use for simple things, which I need to last for 4 years without being prehistoric after 1 or 2, and giving me the possibility to do some video edit if I will need it)?
    :eek:
     
  9. channelv

    channelv Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Agreed, don't get the M4300 over a D830 unless someone else is paying for it (like your company). I have an M4300 from my company, had a D820 before. It is hardly any different.
     
  10. Sir Joe

    Sir Joe Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Well, I have bought the D830... I must tell you that I STRONGLY regret this choice. The WSXGA+ on the D830 is the terrible SEC3350. It is really terrible. DO NOT BUY, EVER, a D830 with WSXGA+. NEVER. Unless you can prove that Dell has changed the model of display. For now, the only one is the SEC3350.
    And, believe me, it is really the worst display I have ever seen on my live.
    I like matte, so I would not like the M4300 with WSXGA+, but if the WUXGA on the M4300 is good, I realy wish I would have bought that...