The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Dell M1330, Hard disks...hmmmm...

    Discussion in 'Dell' started by special, May 2, 2008.

  1. special

    special Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hi, how's everyone doing?

    Going to take the plunge and buy a M1330 - just the right size/performance/price point.

    The only sticking point is the hard disk...deciding between the 320GB 5400rpm and the 200GB 7200rpm.

    I've googled and searched this forum and other forums, and there's no clear answer. The other confounding factor is that the 200GB cost $50-60 less over here in Australia.

    So my issues are:

    1) Capacity
    Obviously the 320GB wins out here...

    2) Speed
    On paper, the 200GB is faster, but I've also heard that higher capacity hard drives are faster (eg. a 200GB is faster than a 160GB) because of density of data on the disk. So how much faster is the 200GB?

    3) Heat and Noise
    Is the 200GB spinning faster, produce more heat and noise than the 320GB?

    4) Battery life
    Does 7200RPM disk sap into your battery life, or does the reduced read/write access times mean that you use your hard disk less (and therefore compensate for the higher speed)?

    Thanks a heap for the help!
     
  2. pukemon

    pukemon are you unplugged?

    Reputations:
    461
    Messages:
    2,551
    Likes Received:
    245
    Trophy Points:
    81
    get the 320 if you have the 50 extra bucks. those 2 hdds are probably about the same speed but i'm sure the 7200 rpm one run's hotter.
     
  3. Apollo13

    Apollo13 100% 16:10 Screens

    Reputations:
    1,432
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    81
    7200 RPM drives are only negligibly hotter, if at all. They still stay well within temperature regulations - if you've got heat problems bad enough to scorch a 7200 drive, chance are very high it will scorch a 5400 as well. Battery life is also within a negligible amount between 5400 and 7200.

    What is comes down to is speed or capacity. If you need lots of storage, go 320. If you don't, go 200 and benefit from faster speed.

    Generally, a 5400 drive of twice the space of a 7200 drive is equally as fast - thus a 160x7200 is about the same speed as a 320x5400. Of course benchmarks are better to go on. It also gets a bit wacky over 320 GB - 500 GB 5400 drives are no more dense than 320's (they just have one more hard drive platter), so they are no faster (well, maybe a very small percentage for the extra 20 GB over 320*1.5).
     
  4. special

    special Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    thanks for the advice and poll votes. Sounds like I'll take whatever special that Dell comes along - I don't need the extra capacity, the speeds sound almost the same, so if they give me a free upgrade to a 320GB...I'll probably just take it.

    Although, the only other question is that I've heard that the 7200rpm drives have free-fall sensor technology etc...does this really make a difference - I don't really envisage on dropping my laptop anytime soon...
     
  5. booji

    booji Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    61
    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I definetly recommend the Free Fall Sensor - it basically stops your disk when it detects vertical movement. There is a PC mag article about its benefits.

    Also, if you really want to check the benfits of the 320gb 5400 rpm vs. 200gb 7200 RPM (isn't it 250 now?), do a google search for benchmarks. That should give you some quantitative data regarding performance for both units.