The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    (Dell Inspiron 1420) Big difference? T7300 and T7500

    Discussion in 'Dell' started by xander7, Oct 27, 2007.

  1. xander7

    xander7 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    hi guys, im planning to order a dell inspiron 1420 this coming monday in hongkong. but i just wana ask, is there a big difference/improvement between T7300(2.0GHz, 4MB L2 Cache, 800 MHz FSB) and T7500 (2.2GHz, 4MB L2 Cache, 800 MHz FSB)? Will these specs change/improve the performance of the laptop dramatically? 3dmarks, speed, etc. Also the 160gb (5400rpm) and 160gb (7200rpm), is there a big improvement if i will choose the 7200?

    Additional questions:

    how about the difference between T7300 (2.0GHz, 4MB L2 Cache, 800 MHz FSB) and the T7250 (2.0GHz, 2MB L2 Cache, 800 MHz FSB)? almost no difference? how about the screens resolution? 14.1" UltraSharpTM Widescreen WXGA+ ( 1440x900) TFT Display with TrueLife(TM) and 14.1" Widescreen WXGA ( 1280x800) TFT Display with TrueLife(TM)?
     
  2. Waveblade

    Waveblade Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    72
    Messages:
    1,037
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The .2 ghz difference won't matter that much IMO. The faster HDD might be worth it though many would say to buy it separately and add it in yourself
     
  3. olphus

    olphus Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I'm in the sane position. What would be an estimate in % difference between the two?
     
  4. xander7

    xander7 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    hehe, hope someone will help us^^
     
  5. Jako

    Jako Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    61
    Messages:
    476
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    31
    2.0 vs 2.2 - no difference, same cpu
    5400 vs 7200 - no difference
    2.2 + 7200 - 10% difference but is it worth it - no
     
  6. manzi

    manzi Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    35
    Messages:
    598
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    There will be no difference between the two unless you run extremly CPU intensive applications. Even the T7100 gives the same performance in every day use compared to the T7300 and T7500.
     
  7. PhoenixFx

    PhoenixFx Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    744
    Messages:
    3,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    For CPU intensive work (Audio/Video encoding. Rendering, simulations etc..) difference is proportional to clock speed. For general computing and games you’ll hardly notice anything.
     
  8. xander7

    xander7 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i see. thanks guys. how about the difference between T7300 (2.0GHz, 4MB L2 Cache, 800 MHz FSB) and the T7250 (2.0GHz, 2MB L2 Cache, 800 MHz FSB)? almost no difference? how about the screens resolution? 14.1" UltraSharpTM Widescreen WXGA+ ( 1440x900) TFT Display with TrueLife(TM) and 14.1" Widescreen WXGA ( 1280x800) TFT Display with TrueLife(TM)?
     
  9. orion23

    orion23 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Again, CPU speed won't matter much if all you are looking for is internet browsing and other light work, which is what most notebooks are made for.

    The screen resolution is a different story.

    The higher the resolution, the more you'll fit in your screen. Less scrolling when reading or browsing, but the text will look smaller as you go higher in terms of resolution.
     
  10. roca808

    roca808 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Hey guys, I'd like to join in on this. I'm looking at the same questions for a vostro unit. One thing I'm curious about though, will a T7300 with 4MB chache run hotter than say a T7100 with 2MB chache? And if so, how much more(significantly)? I've heard that more onborard memory will produce more heat.
     
  11. rajrulesdear

    rajrulesdear Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hi guys ,
    how about the difference between T5250 (1.5 GHz, 2MB L2 Cache, 667 MHz FSB) and the T7250 (2.0GHz, 2MB L2 Cache, 800 MHz FSB)? almost no difference? or is it worth the difference of 170 US Dollar ??
     
  12. xander7

    xander7 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    up! answers please^^
     
  13. vostro1400user

    vostro1400user Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    202
    Messages:
    1,064
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    my T7500 runs cooler than T7300 and T7300 is cooler than T5470. anyone has T7700 or T7800 max temps data on 1420/1400?
     
  14. lizard123

    lizard123 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    My original 1420 was T7100, replacement is T7500. Not much warmer if any. Not much performance improvement beside video editing.
     
  15. xander7

    xander7 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i see. cant wait to have mine.
     
  16. CitizenPanda

    CitizenPanda Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    112
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    The Intel Core architecture scales well with clocks. So with a 0.2 ghz increase = 10%, you are looking at a *max* of 10% performance increases (application wise). On Average it would likely be a 5% increase in performance. The 2mb L2 Cache also adds about 5% increase in performance (There was an Anandtech.com article that specifically addressed this question).

    From the T7250 -> T7500, your looking at an average of 10% increase in performance. I would say for the most part, probably even more.

    As we increase from 2.2 - 2.4 and 2.4 -> 2.6 and 2.6 -> 2.8, you can do the math, the % increase in clocks decrease each time. Diminishing returns in effect. The best speed bump is probably the 1.8 -> 2.0, which comes with 11.11% increase with speed and a 5% increase from the L2 Cache = average of 11%.
     
  17. J-Bytes

    J-Bytes I am CanadiEEEn NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    109
    Messages:
    811
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Please don't just talk and spread around false information.
     
  18. xander7

    xander7 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    so whats the true information?
     
  19. Lite

    Lite Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    342
    Messages:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    so whats better a t7250 or a t7200 ,

    t7200 -----------2.0ghz ------------667fsb ---------4mb cache
    t7250 -----------2.0ghz ------------800fsb ---------2mb cache

    wtih 667 mhz ram