The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Data Collection: How much power an XPS 16 uses

    Discussion in 'Dell XPS and Studio XPS' started by gpig, Jun 28, 2010.

  1. gpig

    gpig Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    82
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I decided to branch this topic off from the other throttling topic. The purpose of checking the power consumption is to possibly find a correlation between normal or abnormal power usage and throttling. If this thread serves no other purpose, it will at least give everyone an idea of how much power their computer is using depending on its load (I know you're interested).

    You can use Vista/Windows 7's built in tool for measuring wattage, using these instructions:

    If you want to help, post your system specs (model, cpu, graphics card, and screen type), and check the power consumption at idle, running furmark, running prime95, and possibly running both. If you know your laptop is throttling on a test, say so.

    Please set every power option set to maximum power/maximum performance including ATI POWERPLAY, this makes a major difference with Furmark!
     
  2. gpig

    gpig Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    82
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    My System: XPS 1645, i7 720QM with 4670 and WLED screen at full brightness

    Here are the results:
    Average idle power, 27.4 watts
    Prime95 small FFTs 8 threads, 63 watts (12 multiplier the whole time)
    Furmark by itself, 75watts average, steady 18fps (no throttling) spikes up to 86watts (probably due to some unrelated service using the CPU)
    FurMark+Prime: up to 95 watts (multipliers at 7 pretty much instantly), 92 watt average, system crash (instant power cut) after 2 minutes
     
  3. lizard5

    lizard5 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Prime by itself (blend test 8 threads)=average watts 68
    Furmark by itself average watts=75 (some throttling)

    Both=multipliers drop down to 7 instantly

    Then 2 minutes after that instant power cut (WHAT IN THE WORLD IS THIS ABOUT?!?!)

    More people need to run these tests...cbaty if you're reading this since you've had sucess with A10, try this test out....
     
  4. Muscle Master

    Muscle Master Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    74
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If anyone got the balls to...

    For those who have 130 watt chargers... how bout you grab a volt meter and tap into the electrical line of an outlet to see how much power the XPS is using
     
  5. error-id10t

    error-id10t Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    30
    When running on Battery (with Furmark+Prime), my Multi is down at 7 (power settings etc are max. for both).

    Anyway, solved it via TS (set it to 12 and not 13) for few seconds until it decided enough was enough and shut itself off. In that time I saw 104W.

    Running A09 nowadays.

    add:
    Prime (small FFTs) alone shows 12 Multi and around 62-63W.
    Furmark (full brightness) runs at around 69W (peaked at 72W).
     
  6. m715

    m715 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    19
    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    To launch Windows Performance Monitor
    - Click Start, click in the Start Search box, type perfmon, and press ENTER

    "Set the scale to 0.001 so it converts the milliwatts data to watts DC"
    - I set the scale but it still read 2,400.00, actually no matter what i changed the scale to it would always read the same?

    1645/i7-720/5730/SSD/WLED/A09 BIOS
    (*System does not throttle w/FurMark + Prime95 on AC power)
    - screen set to max brightness

    Idle: avg-24.2 min-23.5 max-25.7
    FurMark: avg-72.3 min-70.9 max-73.5
    Prime95: avg-55.7 min-55.2 max-58.6
    FM+95: avg-77.5 min-73.5 max-80.6 (throttling @ 9.00-11.00)
     
  7. m715

    m715 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    19
    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    1645/i7-720/4670/320GB 5.4k/WLED/A09 BIOS (this is my old system)
    - screen set to max brightness

    Idle: avg-25.5 min-24.0 max-26.7
    FurMark: avg-70.2 min-68.9 max-73.4
    Prime95: avg-61.9 min-62.0 max-61.6
    FM+95: avg-76.7 min-73.5 max-81.3 (near instant throttling @ 7.00-8.00)
     
  8. error-id10t

    error-id10t Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    30
    This test is quite useless as the Battery throttles straight away, so it will never show the 'real power draw'.

    If I remember correctly, the very early BIOS versions didn't throttle on Battery at all so if someone goes back to those versions and then does this test, it might show something..
     
  9. gpig

    gpig Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    82
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I thought there was a chance that some people's CPU/GPU would just happen to require more power to run when at full GPU or full CPU power.
     
  10. error-id10t

    error-id10t Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Sorry, didn't meant that to sound rude, it's just a shame Dell won't tell the truth and we can't really see the real data.

    I just rolled back to A03 to see if my memory was right and it seems it wasn't. On Battery, it still goes to 7 Multi with both running and turns itself off in few seconds of running TS (to imitate full load at 12 Multi, no Turbo). I'm back at A09 now.

    After going back to A09, I checked how many Watts Hardware Monitor shows the CPU uses when running Furmark alone - it's pretty stable at 15.34W with few Turbo peaks at 55.04W (which we can ignore as Prime only allows it to go to 45W).

    So Furmark (mine peaked at 72W) + 29.66W (45W - 15.34W) = 101.6W. I've already seen my system draw 104W and climbing before it turned itself off, so even that doesn't show the truth..