The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Scorpio 320 GB

    Discussion in 'Asus' started by Deus, Mar 30, 2008.

  1. Deus

    Deus Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  2. RogueMonk

    RogueMonk Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    369
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Yes it will.
     
  3. Deus

    Deus Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Thank you!
     
  4. robohgedhang

    robohgedhang Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    78
    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Sorry, but no, it won't fit, because that one is SATA, whereas W3Js don't have SATA connection (W3J uses the old IDE one).
     
  5. Geared2play.com

    Geared2play.com Company Representative

    Reputations:
    691
    Messages:
    4,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    you are limited to 100gb drives for ide interface unless you wanted toshiba which did make higher. I would rather get a maxtor fireball and wait for it to go up in flames then a toshiba but thats just me
     
  6. robohgedhang

    robohgedhang Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    78
    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Limited to 100 GB drives? Nah... NZWaveRider has 2 (that's two) 250 GB IDE WD Scorpio drives in his W3J.
     
  7. Geared2play.com

    Geared2play.com Company Representative

    Reputations:
    691
    Messages:
    4,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    well w3 has a modular bay for a 2nd drive but i did not think anyone made larger ide drives anymore xept the dead and dying toshiba. i guess wd does still. may explain why their 7200rpm drives are almost non existent
     
  8. Deus

    Deus Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    So what is the final? This does not fit???
     
  9. CalebSchmerge

    CalebSchmerge Woof NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,126
    Messages:
    2,395
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The drive that you linked will not fit because its a SATA drive. There is a 250 GB IDE 5400 RPM drive that you can get here. I just ordered mine, and several others on the forum have it and love it.
     
  10. Cheeseman

    Cheeseman Eats alot of Cheese

    Reputations:
    365
    Messages:
    1,296
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I wonder if a 320GB HDD will fit inside a ASUS M51 or M50 series? :confused:
     
  11. Deus

    Deus Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Thanks all! What are the changes a larger drive will be out soon?
     
  12. ClearSkies

    ClearSkies Well no, I'm still here..

    Reputations:
    1,059
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Depends on WD's marketing staff and whether they believe there is going to continue to be an adequate consumer market for ever-larger notebook IDE drives destined only for user upgrades, as the industry has essentially abandoned the IDE standard several years ago for SATA. The market for 3.5" IDE drives continues, but is also shrinking.

    aka - nobody knows, but the days of IDE notebook drives are probably numbered.
     
  13. ViciousXUSMC

    ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    11,461
    Messages:
    16,824
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Yeah IDE is long gone, even SATA is old news since SATAII has come out but atleast they are compatible with each other.
     
  14. Deus

    Deus Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  15. AlexF

    AlexF Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    142
    Messages:
    795
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  16. Deus

    Deus Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    But I thought a Core 2 Duo Was MUCH better than a Core Duo

    I have a T2500
     
  17. CalebSchmerge

    CalebSchmerge Woof NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,126
    Messages:
    2,395
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    55
    That depends on what you are doing. For things like serious encoding, it will make a difference, for things like Web, Office, and most games, it won't be a big deal at all.
     
  18. ViciousXUSMC

    ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    11,461
    Messages:
    16,824
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    466
    I have been doing alot of video editing and wow I must say c90 was a good choice 2.93ghz Core2Duo maxed out encoding and it still feels slow when rendering some stuff, id hate to have a slower mobile processor.
     
  19. AlexF

    AlexF Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    142
    Messages:
    795
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    T2xxx and T5xxx doesn't really change much. The T5xxx still has 2 MB L2 like the T2xxx series, just that it has some of the newer C2D features. But overall the performance is not that much more. And the T7xxx doesn't get much more from the T5xxx, though it's always nice to have that extra L2 cache.

    BUT, if you're doing encoding, do yourself a favor and get a desktop. Don't even bother with a laptop. It's nice to have the capability if you need it, but I would suggest doing most work on a desktop.

    Under full load for sustained periods, the laptops run REALLY hot really quickly (reduces lifespan of the unit) and you don't get anywhere near the same performance of a desktop. It is not unusual to get temps of about 70-80C under load for a laptop, while a desktop would get about 50C.

    I have an E6320 4MB L2 1066FSB running at 1.8GHz, it beats my T7200 4MB L2 running at 2 GHz (667FSB) by a fair bit due to lower RAM and FSB on the laptop. When I OC my desktop E6320 to 2.3GHz (1333FSB), the T7200 just gets massacred (you cannot OC laptop processors very well).

    You can build a respectable desktop box for half the price of a decent laptop.