The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    parallels vs Fusion - Is there a big difference?

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by passive101, Aug 19, 2007.

  1. passive101

    passive101 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    36
    Messages:
    1,548
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    parallels lets you run windows and so does fusion?
     
  2. Sam

    Sam Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    3,661
    Messages:
    9,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    In a sense, yes. Both are the same concept; run Windows virtually. But there are some minor advantages and disadvantages between the two.

    The sticky that I wrote highlights differences between Parallels and Fusion. The answer to your question is there.

    http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=145917
     
  3. Eluzion

    Eluzion Notebook Consultant NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    89
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I was previously on Parallels but now Fusion. Fusion is definitely faster, especially since it allows you to run both cores within Windows. Never saw an option for this with Parallels and based on what I read, Parallels only uses one core for Windows. Check out the sticky though, the benchmarks speak for themselves I think. ;)
     
  4. dbam987

    dbam987 wicked-poster

    Reputations:
    565
    Messages:
    2,530
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Its impressive to see Fusion run intensive tasks about 3 times faster than what Parallels can muster (according to CNET's review).

    One thing I did notice with Fusion is that you can do is put a Windows application icon in the Dock, and when you want to run that application it will go ahead and startup Windows and launch the application after. Awesome.
     
  5. L.Rawlins

    L.Rawlins Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    29
    Messages:
    576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Does it bypass all the excess procedures that Fusion must endure giving the user the experience that you're simply opening a Windows application as you would any other OSX application?

    Or does clicking on the apps icon open up Fusion first? I'd ideally like both Fusion and Parallels to be completely transparent to the experience.
     
  6. dbam987

    dbam987 wicked-poster

    Reputations:
    565
    Messages:
    2,530
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    It opens up Fusion, and I think it goes straight to Unity.

    I actually like the app launcher tool in VMWare when using Unity. I think there's a menu item in the menu bar that gives you access to the Start Menu as well. Its kind of hidden, but that would be one thing VMWare should make more readily available to the user.
     
  7. Sam

    Sam Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    3,661
    Messages:
    9,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    It opens up Fusion in the background. So yes, you either have to have Fusion already open or by clicking that Windows app on the Dock you open Fusion as well.

    And just a note, dbam, the "drag a PC app on the Dock" is also available for Parallels :).
     
  8. KelchM

    KelchM Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    109
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I've used both. Fusion runs much better.
     
  9. L.Rawlins

    L.Rawlins Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    29
    Messages:
    576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I also like how Fusion doesn't appear to litter all of your Windows apps on the Mac's dock with its own proprietary sub-branding like Parallels appears to.

    I know, it's an incredibly minor detail, but I know that having the Parallels logo slapped all over the place would really irritate me.
     
  10. taelrak

    taelrak Lost

    Reputations:
    860
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Keep in mind that Fusions Unity mode and launch-from-dock don't work perfectly yet, especially for some of the "weirder" applications in Windows. For example, certain "applications" drag to the Dock as simply "Windows Explorer" and others don't drag at all. Also, depending on the program and how you set up your taskbar, you might end up with a pseudo-Windows task bar at the bottom of your screen - this might be a good thing depending on what you're doing though. The Sidebar in Vista in particular tends to do this (actually you can even keep it up in OSX - it actually traps an image of that portion of your Windows desktop as well).