The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    nother useless update for most - but Xserve servers are EOL

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by crazycanuk, Nov 6, 2010.

  1. crazycanuk

    crazycanuk Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,354
    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Apple - Xserve - Resources

    for those of us that care Apple is discontinuing the Xserve rackmount servers. if you are needing one you have until Jan 31.

    a side note, Apple Please make another rackmount and not force people into minis or Pros to act as a server, the buisiness and graphics minions are rather annoyed by this announcement
     
  2. Budding

    Budding Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,686
    Messages:
    3,982
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    I don't think Apple's Xserve units were very successful. Although a rackmount form factor is convenient, people can just install the OS X Server on any Mac and use that as a server instead.
     
  3. crazycanuk

    crazycanuk Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,354
    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    very true but using mac minis takes more space than a rackmount and no fibrechannel, Mac Pros take even more space .... and for a large server cluster its a pain to have to redesign a cluster or node away from rackmounts. Yes it is more convienience but hey space and simplicity is nice for some of us lazy admins.
     
  4. ltcommander_data

    ltcommander_data Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    408
    Messages:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Given the undoubtedly low sale volumes of XServes compared to other Macs and the disproportionate development effort needed to design a good stable server, I can see why Apple would want to drop the XServe. However, I agree that the Mac Mini or Mac Pro are hardly direct replacement options for the XServe's use case. The lack of Lights-Out Management has been pointed out as a key missing feature. Personally, I'm confused with this move after the recent push to get OS X Server into business due to the cost effectiveness of unlimited seat licenses and as an Exchange alternative as a halo effect of business iPhone adoption. I thought this was going well with Apple signing a contract with Unisys to help businesses integrate Apple products, now this is looks like they are tying a hand behind their back.
     
  5. crazycanuk

    crazycanuk Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,354
    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    thats what some of the businesses I deal with with Mac backends are thinking. many are starting to think Apple is actually backing OUT of the business market again like they did in the mid 90's and even the hard core mac AV crowd is getting worried as they have no interest in setting up mac pro clusters for rendering and feel that Apple is leaving them for the consumer gizmos.
     
  6. Seshan

    Seshan Rawrrr!

    Reputations:
    540
    Messages:
    1,989
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Well, no server system is going to be a big time seller. But it does suck for the companies that used them. I'm not sure what Apple is thinking even if they were not making lots of money on it, they have enough spare cash laying around that they could afford to keep them. Some people are even fearing that there will not be another Final Cut. At this rate, I could believe it.